FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TVS 2300 potential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #51  
04Burban's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, NC
Default

subscribed...waiting for end result...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 11:12 PM
  #52  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by EVILGMC
****...i better fix mine and get to the dyno.

and yes, joe made big power..cant remember the number...with his LS2 at 21psi
Yes he did!

When I was at Dutt's shop Joe's LSx block was there for his next build; gonna be schweet!

I think Kenny showed us a graph where he made 970fwhp with the 2300 setup/21lbs of boost/434cid getting close!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 11:48 PM
  #53  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Originally Posted by MNC5
It will make a 1000fwhp with the right setup $$$. Don't think 434ci's are needed to get there either. Better than a turbo any day

LMAO, yea sure...


Originally Posted by moregrip
fyi.....while out for a Sunday ride with BC today I saw upwards of 900fwhp on a TVS 2300 setup!
Originally Posted by moregrip
don't know all the details but it was a jackshaft TVS2300 on top of a 434cid LS motor pushing 20+ lbs of boost@ 6200rpm-ish

It was fairly badass wheeee!

I hope I can remember these comments during the next turbo vs. Radix argument....


*** it, lets start one now....



If I had a 434ci pushing 20+ psi of boost, it had damn well better be making MORE than 1K RWHP... STUPID ***, BOILING HOT AIR BLOWERS!! And you guys are seeing close to 900 at the flywheel.... So around 800 at the wheels??? seams about the proven limit. Why would ANYONE even want one of those???? SO, you dumped all the money into 434 and all the junk to make it work and not clear 1,000 rwhp??? Right, no lag.... LAME
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 11:51 PM
  #54  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
LMAO, yea sure...







I hope I can remember these comments during the next turbo vs. Radix argument....


*** it, lets start one now....



If I had a 434ci pushing 20+ psi of boost, it had damn well better be making MORE than 1K RWHP... STUPID ***, BOILING HOT AIR BLOWERS!! And you guys are seeing close to 900 at the flywheel.... So around 800 at the wheels??? seams about the proven limit. Why would ANYONE even want one of those???? SO, you dumped all the money into 434 and all the junk to make it work and not clear 1,000 rwhp??? Right, no lag.... LAME
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 01:41 AM
  #55  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
LMAO, yea sure...







I hope I can remember these comments during the next turbo vs. Radix argument....


*** it, lets start one now....



If I had a 434ci pushing 20+ psi of boost, it had damn well better be making MORE than 1K RWHP... STUPID ***, BOILING HOT AIR BLOWERS!! And you guys are seeing close to 900 at the flywheel.... So around 800 at the wheels??? seams about the proven limit. Why would ANYONE even want one of those???? SO, you dumped all the money into 434 and all the junk to make it work and not clear 1,000 rwhp??? Right, no lag.... LAME

WOW!!
Lots of new potential sig material in there somewhere...where should I start!!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 02:06 AM
  #56  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
LMAO, yea sure...







I hope I can remember these comments during the next turbo vs. Radix argument....


*** it, lets start one now....



If I had a 434ci pushing 20+ psi of boost, it had damn well better be making MORE than 1K RWHP... STUPID ***, BOILING HOT AIR BLOWERS!! And you guys are seeing close to 900 at the flywheel.... So around 800 at the wheels??? seams about the proven limit. Why would ANYONE even want one of those???? SO, you dumped all the money into 434 and all the junk to make it work and not clear 1,000 rwhp??? Right, no lag.... LAME
aren't you tired of that **** yet? I am.

let's keep this one on topic ok
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #57  
fastnblu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
fyi.....while out for a Sunday ride with BC today I saw upwards of 900fwhp on a TVS 2300 setup!

...

don't know all the details but it was a jackshaft TVS2300 on top of a 434cid LS motor pushing 20+ lbs of boost@ 6200rpm-ish
What, no vids; pics?!?

Originally Posted by moregrip
well from what I've discovered 780fwhp is right at the meat of where the TVS2300 starts to make power. 1000hp is there and it would take some work but I imagine it's not that far off either...in fact, I'd venture to say it will happen sometime this year
... "happen sometime this year", I think someone knows somethin or is privy & holdin out on us. Spill it Devin.

Originally Posted by old motorhead
Glad it's someone else's money on the quest for a thousand. Think I'll just keep enjoying my measly 650 to 750 (flywheel). ...
Agreed, on someone else's coin.

Spoolin, I thought Duttweiller used a 408 not a LSX 427 on a article in 1 of the rags, HRM or CC. Or was there another that made 900+ w/. a 2300?
Maybe 2 different builds, but I also thought it was a 1900. Correct me when ya confirm.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 11:28 AM
  #58  
Lucille's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham
Default

If you were going for an all out rectangle port TVS build, where would you go as far as heads? Lots of options for the cathedral port heads but not so much for the L92 head crowd.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #59  
2004SSS's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: southern california
Default

im sorry but im with dustee on this one. there are so many better options out there than a 2.3l blower on large cube setup . just takes more knowledge and less off the shelf parts to do so .
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #60  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Lucille
If you were going for an all out rectangle port TVS build, where would you go as far as heads? Lots of options for the cathedral port heads but not so much for the L92 head crowd.
West Coast Cylinder Heads are what he is running on the 434. Richard really has some of the best performing Heads out there!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.