Turbo guys, does this seem normal?
Sep 1, 2008 | 12:31 PM
#31
These are the spec's on the 8.1 MARINE injectors...
Part Number 17113739 (OE Part # 25176061)
Direct fit for short G.M. LS1 SUV injectors
Static flow @ 37.95lb/hr @ 43.5PSI / 300KPa (4.31 g/s = 398cc/min)
Static flow @ 43.82lb/hr @ 58PSI / 400KPa (4.97 g/s = 460cc/min) *
Dynamic flow (2.0ms/10.0 ms(pulse width / rep rate)) 6.0 lb/hr @ 43.5PSI (0.748 g/s @ 300KPa)
Coil Resistance: High Impedance / High-Z (No ECM driver modifications required)
The SVO injectors (car injectors) are rated at 42lbs/hr @ 43PSI (3bar) fuel pressure making them about 49lbs/hr @ our 58psi (4bar) fuel pressure. I hope there is no more confusion about this
Part Number 17113739 (OE Part # 25176061)
Direct fit for short G.M. LS1 SUV injectors
Static flow @ 37.95lb/hr @ 43.5PSI / 300KPa (4.31 g/s = 398cc/min)
Static flow @ 43.82lb/hr @ 58PSI / 400KPa (4.97 g/s = 460cc/min) *
Dynamic flow (2.0ms/10.0 ms(pulse width / rep rate)) 6.0 lb/hr @ 43.5PSI (0.748 g/s @ 300KPa)
Coil Resistance: High Impedance / High-Z (No ECM driver modifications required)
The SVO injectors (car injectors) are rated at 42lbs/hr @ 43PSI (3bar) fuel pressure making them about 49lbs/hr @ our 58psi (4bar) fuel pressure. I hope there is no more confusion about this
Sep 1, 2008 | 12:43 PM
#32
Sep 1, 2008 | 04:02 PM
#33
These are the spec's on the 8.1 MARINE injectors...
Part Number 17113739 (OE Part # 25176061)
Direct fit for short G.M. LS1 SUV injectors
Static flow @ 37.95lb/hr @ 43.5PSI / 300KPa (4.31 g/s = 398cc/min)
Static flow @ 43.82lb/hr @ 58PSI / 400KPa (4.97 g/s = 460cc/min) *
Dynamic flow (2.0ms/10.0 ms(pulse width / rep rate)) 6.0 lb/hr @ 43.5PSI (0.748 g/s @ 300KPa)
Coil Resistance: High Impedance / High-Z (No ECM driver modifications required)
The SVO injectors (car injectors) are rated at 42lbs/hr @ 43PSI (3bar) fuel pressure making them about 49lbs/hr @ our 58psi (4bar) fuel pressure. I hope there is no more confusion about this
Part Number 17113739 (OE Part # 25176061)
Direct fit for short G.M. LS1 SUV injectors
Static flow @ 37.95lb/hr @ 43.5PSI / 300KPa (4.31 g/s = 398cc/min)
Static flow @ 43.82lb/hr @ 58PSI / 400KPa (4.97 g/s = 460cc/min) *
Dynamic flow (2.0ms/10.0 ms(pulse width / rep rate)) 6.0 lb/hr @ 43.5PSI (0.748 g/s @ 300KPa)
Coil Resistance: High Impedance / High-Z (No ECM driver modifications required)
The SVO injectors (car injectors) are rated at 42lbs/hr @ 43PSI (3bar) fuel pressure making them about 49lbs/hr @ our 58psi (4bar) fuel pressure. I hope there is no more confusion about this
Delphi's
Sep 1, 2008 | 08:06 PM
#34
Sep 3, 2008 | 10:28 PM
#35
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
So...today I asked my builder, Steve at S&L performance (since trtturbo closed down...RIP), to plan on an alky control meth kit, electric cutout and a Magnaflow bullet style muffler (as long as possible) with 3-4 inch diameter, performance tune, more boost, and maybe a boost controller? Any other suggestions from the turbo Gods on this site? You know who you are guys... come on, spill it. 
Sep 3, 2008 | 11:32 PM
#38
So...today I asked my builder, Steve at S&L performance (since trtturbo closed down...RIP), to plan on an alky control meth kit, electric cutout and a Magnaflow bullet style muffler (as long as possible) with 3-4 inch diameter, performance tune, more boost, and maybe a boost controller? Any other suggestions from the turbo Gods on this site? You know who you are guys... come on, spill it.
Sep 4, 2008 | 02:37 PM
#39
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Last I checked it wasn't available for the '07 Classic but I'll recheck.
Well, that's definitely a relevant question. I'm already feeling guilty for what I've spent since last August even if it is a legitimate business expense. It always comes down to the almighty dollar doesn't it? I think that since another tranny upgrade is in my future and I want to stay with the t67 for now, it would need to be cost effective. Got a good forged short block now, Patriot stg 2's, ported throttle body and intake, cam for good performance & still good gas mileage. I have thought about a 50-75 wet shot to get me gone quicker with my retightened converter. I still have stock wrapped exhaust. Need to pass TX emissions also. I want what everyone wants...more than what is good for me. I was offered a fast 92 setup and passed on it. I won't run drag radials on the street but hell, I dream of a 6.90 and be a REAL DD. You know, have your cake and eat it too. I know I could have made the Vette a 9 second car by now with what I've already spent...but it's not as good of a DD.
Well, that's definitely a relevant question. I'm already feeling guilty for what I've spent since last August even if it is a legitimate business expense. It always comes down to the almighty dollar doesn't it? I think that since another tranny upgrade is in my future and I want to stay with the t67 for now, it would need to be cost effective. Got a good forged short block now, Patriot stg 2's, ported throttle body and intake, cam for good performance & still good gas mileage. I have thought about a 50-75 wet shot to get me gone quicker with my retightened converter. I still have stock wrapped exhaust. Need to pass TX emissions also. I want what everyone wants...more than what is good for me.
I was offered a fast 92 setup and passed on it. I won't run drag radials on the street but hell, I dream of a 6.90 and be a REAL DD. You know, have your cake and eat it too. I know I could have made the Vette a 9 second car by now with what I've already spent...but it's not as good of a DD.
Sep 4, 2008 | 05:10 PM
#40
Given what you've said, I'd not go much further. You are rapidly going to get past the DD threshold if you add much power.
I would focus on getting the most of this current setup -- do the meth, do the tuning, do what you've listed.
I would focus on getting the most of this current setup -- do the meth, do the tuning, do what you've listed.