FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

too much cam for a 5.3??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #1  
terravast4's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default too much cam for a 5.3??

was thinking about going bigger than my gt2-3 cam .. saw a clip of the LPE ZL1 cam... sounds sick for a blower cam. 223/235 .610/.620 115.0 would this be too big of a cam for my 5.3 and 2600 stall? opinions please.....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #2  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

IMO yes but I like smaller cams. I would run a higher stall speed with that cam.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
Jackal1's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

im sure you would need a bigger stall, i was running a 232/236 on a 109 lsa on my 5.3 with a 4400 stall and 411 gears, n/a setup truck was a beast.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 02:22 PM
  #4  
terravast4's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

dont wanna go bigger than the 2600 with my blower....just thought it might be "doable " on the larger scale of things...i drive a few miles back and forth to work daily so it doesn't have to have super great street manners. maybe i should just build a 6.0
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

I wouldnt run that cam in your truck.

That was designed for a 6.2 with square port heads.

if youre really feelin a bigger cam then you can do better than that. First you dont need nearly that much cam for a 5.3 to sound like that, and second a cam with duraiton numbers that large on a 5.3 would call for more RPM than that 112 wants to give you.

218/226 on a 114 would sound plenty healthy in a 5.3. Give it 3* advance too.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
terravast4's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

thanks for the advice...appreciate it
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 10:43 PM
  #7  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Are you looking for more power? Or just a choppier idle?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2014 | 10:58 PM
  #8  
terravast4's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

more power.....i like the choppy idle but really trying to maximize what i have. i love the gt2-3 but i thing theres more room there to make power
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2014 | 01:02 AM
  #9  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Do you have a timeslip you can post, and/or a dyno sheet?

I know your cam specs, but not your cyl head specs. Give me some info for a starting point, and I'll give you my opinion. Also, which 2600 converter are you running.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2014 | 12:48 PM
  #10  
terravast4's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

the converter is a circle d triple disc 2600. the heads are prc 2.5 which is a stock 5.3 casting ported and polished with 2.02 and 1.575 valves. no dyno sheet but making somewhere in the 470-500 rwhp range
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.