Some recent IAT findings
#12
Something odd to note- seems with the lower intercooler temps I lost a little bit of boost. I didn't really think it was hot enough before for expansion to play a role that much.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
#14
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
I don't know how much boost you are running, but lets say 12psi. You said you gained 75F in IATs through the run. Lets assume you started at 90F. Assuming 75% efficiency for the blower, so the A2W efficiency has to be about 48% with 100F water as coolant.
So now if you only increase 25F on the same setup, then intercooler efficiency must be about 88% which is very good. Keep in mind this is very simplified since everything chances with time (temperatures, pressures, and efficiencies).
If you lost boost (how much?), then you could get the same result in temperature with 85% intercooler and 10psi boost. So how much boost did you loose exactly, and what were the before and after temperatures?
#17
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Yep, that's strictly from the temperature decrease
P2=P1*(T1/T2)^(k-1) (polytropic gas relationship)
P1=15.5
T1=189+459
T2=99+459
K=1.4
So P2=14.6
That's a good thing also...the less boost, the less power the SC needs so you get a double benefit. Keep in mind the airflow is constant though since its set based on the rpm and pulley ratios.
P2=P1*(T1/T2)^(k-1) (polytropic gas relationship)
P1=15.5
T1=189+459
T2=99+459
K=1.4
So P2=14.6
That's a good thing also...the less boost, the less power the SC needs so you get a double benefit. Keep in mind the airflow is constant though since its set based on the rpm and pulley ratios.






