FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Sc H2 wanting a little more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #11  
CHarris's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: Poulsbo, WA
Default

Originally Posted by ttkresurfacing
Thanks everyone. Atleast I have a good idea now. With the 3.0 pulley, will the throttle body change help at all?

Thanks,
Tim
No idea on specific power gain as that wasn't available when I had mine. It should make some more power though. So will adding E-fans... but again you'll be creeping up on tranny slippage time. The closer you get to the same power level as the 2.9 pulley, the closer you are to slippage on a fully stock transmission.

Have you considered a nice Yank convertor yet? I waited too long to get mine. I have the Pro 3000. Love it.
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #12  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
Also ask your transmission builder about the vacuum modulator kit for your transmission. It's a life saver and allowed me to run down to 13.86 in my H2.
Just curious to know specifically what you like about this upgrade?

Personally, I had the vac mod in my FLP and hated it in combination with the Radix. Since its so easy to get into boost at part throttle, the vac mod was unleashing the full pressure shifts just about all the time. I would be clenching my teeth every time I could feel the 1-2 shift approaching with mid throttle. In fact, I got into a habit of letting off the throttle (to give it vacuum pressure) just before the shifts so it wouldn't hit as hard. I would much rather have electronic control of them via the PCM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #13  
ttkresurfacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

No convertor yet but planning to get tranny redone very heavy duty and have one installed then. I already have electric fans, basically I was trying to get as much out of it as I can without having to tear into the internals for now. Had it dynoed and it hit like 520 or 530 hp on an old Mustang dyno, but after driving it for a while I wouldn't mind more.

Tim

Last edited by ttkresurfacing; May 11, 2007 at 11:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 11:50 PM
  #14  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by ttkresurfacing
No convertor yet but planning to get tranny redone very heavy duty and have one installed then. I already have electric fans, basically I was trying to get as much out of it as I can without having to tear into the internals for now. Had it dynoed and it hit like 520 or 530 hp on an old Mustang dyno, but after driving it for a while I wouldn't mind more.

Tim
520 or 530? RWHP? Holy crap that sounds like a little much! But if so, congrats on that!
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #15  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
Just curious to know specifically what you like about this upgrade?

Personally, I had the vac mod in my FLP and hated it in combination with the Radix. Since its so easy to get into boost at part throttle, the vac mod was unleashing the full pressure shifts just about all the time. I would be clenching my teeth every time I could feel the 1-2 shift approaching with mid throttle. In fact, I got into a habit of letting off the throttle (to give it vacuum pressure) just before the shifts so it wouldn't hit as hard. I would much rather have electronic control of them via the PCM.
When I had my tranny built I asked about this and was told to stick with the electronic shifting
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
CHarris's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: Poulsbo, WA
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
When I had my tranny built I asked about this and was told to stick with the electronic shifting
You guys (moregrip and BigTex) both have lighter weight trucks. I ran - and still have - all the billet servos and the vacuum mod. In the heavy truck (6800 lbs) its all fine. Part throttle is like stock shifting but faster... not hard at all. Full throttle is super firm... but not teeth rattling. The weight must be the difference. Or the way in which your shift kits were installed. Every builder has their own preferences.

I know that I was advised to get the corvette servo instead of the billet one for the 3rd gear. Was told it would likely be too hard. This advice was based on what has been experienced in the 4L60E Camaros. With that lighter car it really does behave as you've mentioned. I went with the hard core parts anyway and everyone was very surprised at the mildness of them. Looks to me like once you cross 6000 lbs the rules of the "little" trucks no longer apply. Bear in mind... the H2 can get into boost at a little less than 30% throttle in hill regions. I have lots of hills and still no harshness at part throttle.

I still stand by my recommendation about the trans build. If you stick with the electronics for pressure you are at the mercy of your tuning and MAF. With the vacuum mod you are full pressure when you need it and driving nice when you don't. Less complication and less risk for error (failure). With the vacuum mod... the failure mode for the line pressure is max. So if your vacuum line popped off from not being clamped or the line breaks or whatever... your trans is safer because you cannot get into the higher hp range with minimal pressure. You'll also know there is an issue because of the hard shifts at part throttle and have time to replace/reconnect the line without doing damage to the trans. Not so with the electronic tuning.

Mine hasn't had a single hiccup since built and seems to be ready to go deeper into the 13's. As the only guy around who's posted any results from the H2... I'd carefully consider what I've said and then make your decision. If not... I wish you luck as it can be an expensive learning curve.

Last edited by CHarris; May 12, 2007 at 11:40 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 07:32 PM
  #17  
ttkresurfacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

How much more boost will the 3.0 pulley make over the 3.1?

Thanks,
Tim
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #18  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ttkresurfacing
How much more boost will the 3.0 pulley make over the 3.1?

Thanks,
Tim
.5-1 psi. two tenths smaller usually make up 1 psi.
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #19  
BigCountryx's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge
Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
You guys (moregrip and BigTex) both have lighter weight trucks.
You guys need to put that in your sigs......You'll never hear those words uttered again
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gadgetized
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
39
Aug 21, 2020 03:14 PM
Steve-O-08
PROJECTS GALLERY
323
Apr 19, 2018 09:32 AM
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
Dec 27, 2016 09:30 AM
ssierra08
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 15, 2015 06:40 AM
Black-Syde
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
0
Jul 6, 2015 02:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.