Radix 112 cam selection help.
#1
So I am in the market with cam swapping my Monte Carlo, during this time I am also making some other changes.
A brief rundown of my build right now is a stock 5.3, with a radix 112, 1-3/4 midlength headers, 3.0 pulley with a T56 Trans and I am currently making 430whp and 415wtq.
My intentions now are 90mm J-tube, 90mm PTM throttlebody, 60lb Deka injectors, 1-7/8 longtubes, dual QTP 3" cutouts, and a cam swap.
The two cams I am trying to decide between is the Vinci trucker or the Vinci Hi-lift trucker, here are the specs on those two cams.
The Trucker
DUR @ .004" 278*/ 286*
DUR @ .050" 216*/ 224*
LIFT .551/.551
LSA 115*
Hi-lift Trucker
DUR @ .004" 278*/ 286*
DUR @ .050" 216*/ 224*
LIFT .585 /.585
LSA 115*
Any help will be appreciated!
A brief rundown of my build right now is a stock 5.3, with a radix 112, 1-3/4 midlength headers, 3.0 pulley with a T56 Trans and I am currently making 430whp and 415wtq.
My intentions now are 90mm J-tube, 90mm PTM throttlebody, 60lb Deka injectors, 1-7/8 longtubes, dual QTP 3" cutouts, and a cam swap.
The two cams I am trying to decide between is the Vinci trucker or the Vinci Hi-lift trucker, here are the specs on those two cams.
The Trucker
DUR @ .004" 278*/ 286*
DUR @ .050" 216*/ 224*
LIFT .551/.551
LSA 115*
Hi-lift Trucker
DUR @ .004" 278*/ 286*
DUR @ .050" 216*/ 224*
LIFT .585 /.585
LSA 115*
Any help will be appreciated!
#4
Why would I need to pulley down? I know as I increase the efficiency of the engine that output of boost will be decreased from the blower. But I'm trying to not spin the blower harder and hotter to the point that I need meth. Unless increasing the efficiency of the engine will cause the blower to not work as hard with the 3.0 pulley that I can jump to a 2.8 pulley and not increase IAT Temps. I'm between 35-45 degrees above ambiant temp
Trending Topics
#8
If you are running stock ratio rockers, get the high lift.
I run the low lift with Crane 1.8 rockers. The end result is the same valve lift.
With 799 heads, 90mm J tube, 92mm throttle body, 1 7/8 ARH, and a 2.8" pulley, my combo makes 14 psi and ran 11.6 at 113. The math put my combo at around 609 rwhp. TImZ's truck (same configuration/weight as mine) ran the same ET & MPH and dyno'd a little higher than that.
How's that for some good ole fashion bench racing?
I run the low lift with Crane 1.8 rockers. The end result is the same valve lift.
With 799 heads, 90mm J tube, 92mm throttle body, 1 7/8 ARH, and a 2.8" pulley, my combo makes 14 psi and ran 11.6 at 113. The math put my combo at around 609 rwhp. TImZ's truck (same configuration/weight as mine) ran the same ET & MPH and dyno'd a little higher than that.
How's that for some good ole fashion bench racing?
#9
If you are running stock ratio rockers, get the high lift.
I run the low lift with Crane 1.8 rockers. The end result is the same valve lift.
With 799 heads, 90mm J tube, 92mm throttle body, 1 7/8 ARH, and a 2.8" pulley, my combo makes 14 psi and ran 11.6 at 113. The math put my combo at around 609 rwhp. TImZ's truck (same configuration/weight as mine) ran the same ET & MPH and dyno'd a little higher than that.
How's that for some good ole fashion bench racing?
I run the low lift with Crane 1.8 rockers. The end result is the same valve lift.
With 799 heads, 90mm J tube, 92mm throttle body, 1 7/8 ARH, and a 2.8" pulley, my combo makes 14 psi and ran 11.6 at 113. The math put my combo at around 609 rwhp. TImZ's truck (same configuration/weight as mine) ran the same ET & MPH and dyno'd a little higher than that.
How's that for some good ole fashion bench racing?

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GrooveCityZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Aug 31, 2015 12:05 PM



