My Truck is the Lysholm Test Truck
10-20-2011, 06:03 AM
#41
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, Lance (our calibrator) said that the cal. is NOT speed density during normal driving conditions, but running off of the MAF.* It may switch to SD in certain start-up or idle circumstances, but under normal driving conditions it is using the MAF....... Here is what the engineer just sent me.
10-20-2011, 09:29 AM
#42
Let me get off work today and I'll get a couple pics of the setup on here.. Thought I had them in my email still. Yes their baseline dyno on a mustang dyno was 260hp 267tq I do have oversized tires so that could account for the lower numbers along with the mustang dyno. After their tuning that they changed to speed density it finished at 350hp 325tq. It defiantly feels better dropped a full second on my 0-60 time and I don't even think it's tuned for Texas DA.
10-20-2011, 10:23 AM
#43
What's up with that 'box' in the intake track? The system on the Vortech site shows the supercharger inlet/tb on the pass side directly connected to the stock air box. Wonder why they switched it over to the driver side added that contraption of an intake?
This...
VS this...
This...
VS this...
10-20-2011, 11:51 AM
#46
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Over Yunder
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He must have the one for the camaro. he did say he had a 6.2L. the website shows passenger side for the trucks and drivers side for the camaro. and only 5.3L for trucks 
must have had to do some fab work to make the camaro blower work in a truck. but the website says 450 HP on a 5.3L. Needs a REAL tune!
must have had to do some fab work to make the camaro blower work in a truck. but the website says 450 HP on a 5.3L. Needs a REAL tune!
10-20-2011, 02:06 PM
#47
Ahh, makes sense now. They took the easy route and just put the entire Camaro assembly on instead of swapping lower manifolds from the truck assembly to match the heads. Seems like swapping lower manifolds would be more economical than fabbing a whole new intake tube and coolant hose. :dunno:
