FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Much difference between a Raxix MP122 vs 1900?

Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:23 PM
  #11  
PDPERFORMANCE's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Was the tvs unit the one on ebay couple days ago?n20suki will u be getting rid of 112
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 02:04 PM
  #12  
Gadgetized's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Default

I thought the number referred to the size in cubic inches.
MP90 90 cubic inches or 1.47 liter
MP112 112 cubic inches or 1.84 liters
MP122 122 cubic inches or 2.0 liters

TVS1900 116 cubic inches or 1.9 liters
TVS2300 140 cubic inches or 2.3 liters

The main advantage is the intercooler under the supercharger. The Radix styler older intercoolers were small, and often could not keep up with cooling the air charge. The TVS style has improved that over the older style. It honestly really depends on how much power you want to make, and how hard you will be pushing the supercharger.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 02:15 PM
  #13  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

The main advantage is the lobe design, not the intercooler.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 03:20 PM
  #14  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
The main advantage is the lobe design, not the intercooler.
Exactly.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 05:09 PM
  #15  
N20zuki's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth City NC
Default

Originally Posted by PDPERFORMANCE
Was the tvs unit the one on ebay couple days ago?n20suki will u be getting rid of 112
Yes it was the Ebay one, I did not win the auction. Once it broke 3500$ I threw in the towel, So no I will not be getting rid of my 112 just yet.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 05:40 PM
  #16  
Gadgetized's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
The main advantage is the lobe design, not the intercooler.
I stand corrected. I had spent a lot of time researching the intercooler design of the MP112 and how inefficient it was. I was unaware that the rotor design had changed so much to the TVS units. Even though the intercooler is no where near as efficient, the rotor design is also a drastic change. Here are some pics.



Here are a couple pics that were posted in another thread by KB Racing.

MP112 intercooler



TVS1900/2300 intercooler

Name:  DSCF0020.jpg
Views: 235
Size:  72.7 KB
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #17  
PDPERFORMANCE's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Yup x2 here i stopped at 3200 still was a decent deal
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
twake_410
NITROUS OXIDE
17
Apr 14, 2016 09:58 PM
wickedRCSB
GM Parts Classifieds
2
Oct 30, 2015 09:45 PM
Staggered 02
Member Feedback
6
Oct 9, 2015 05:19 PM
gmcyukon
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Oct 5, 2015 06:20 AM
sTNT971
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
0
Sep 26, 2015 06:27 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.