Lyscholm Vs MagnaCharger
Apr 28, 2006 | 03:16 PM
#11
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by BigTex
Did magnusson create an adapter plate for the whipple compresor and run a different drive snout, but still use the Radix belt routing and brackets? I for one would like to see a picture. 
yep and nope
Apr 28, 2006 | 03:31 PM
#13
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by BigTex
You had to know where this discussion would head. 
Did I ever tell you I have an extra whipple sitting in my garage.....
Did I ever tell you I have an extra whipple sitting in my garage.....
it its a 2300, you will make more power with the 122.
Last edited by BlownChevy; Apr 28, 2006 at 03:44 PM.
Apr 28, 2006 | 03:45 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by BigTex
Its for my 5.3 Z71 Tahoe. I'm going to intercool it and use it on my daily driver. Just haven't gotten around to messing with it yet.
Apr 28, 2006 | 05:33 PM
#18
did you log the boost presure? i am guesing the boost came on a little harder in the midrange with the whipple. if so this gave it the extra tq but i also gave it the extra heat.
why would the 122 will make more overall power than the 2.3screw?
thanks for these interesting tests. keep them coming!!
why would the 122 will make more overall power than the 2.3screw?
thanks for these interesting tests. keep them coming!!
Apr 28, 2006 | 05:41 PM
#19
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by parish8
why would the 122 will make more overall power than the 2.3screw?
lower discharge temps = more timing
I should have said, the package will make more power.