FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How many RWHP does a 5000lbs truck needs to run 6 sec in the 1/8th??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2017 | 10:33 PM
  #11  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

More like 15% I think as measured by an AWD dyno. It is very noticeable thats for sure.
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 01:36 AM
  #12  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

Mine went 6.60's around 102 mph in full street trim at 4550 lbs.

Never had it dyno'd turned up that high but if I had to guess it would have been somewhere in the neighborhood of 700-800 rwhp. Probably on the lower side.
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 06:32 AM
  #13  
smokinlmm's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 558
From: Coastal NC
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
More like 15% I think as measured by an AWD dyno. It is very noticeable thats for sure.
I was told 18 to 22% depending on what parts in the trans. Kinda depressing to know I will loose that much to heat production and to spin the added weight of the four wheel drive axle.
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 07:37 AM
  #14  
Choda's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 62
From: Buffalo NY
Default

that calculator seems accurate for all of my vehicles I have raced.... says my truck should do 11.7 at 114
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 09:06 AM
  #15  
Bluecobra's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 2
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
More like 15% I think as measured by an AWD dyno. It is very noticeable thats for sure.
Waaaay back when mine was bone stock we dynoed it before blower install and the driveline loss was right at 24%. Of course, that is assuming GMs claim of 275 crank hp for a stock 2000 5.3 was accurate. It made 208 rwhp.
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 09:41 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 2
From: cedar bluff,alabama
Default

I had to add 2psi to my setup before it would pull as hard in 4wd as it would in 2hi...if that makes sense.
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 03:58 PM
  #17  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

damn I'm glad I don't try to go fast with trucks anymore LOL. I went 6.80 with probably around 480 rwhp
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 01:26 AM
  #18  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by smokinlmm
I was told 18 to 22% depending on what parts in the trans. Kinda depressing to know I will loose that much to heat production and to spin the added weight of the four wheel drive axle.
Hence why the smart people race 2wd cars..........


...almost everyone on this site is a fool, know what I mean. lol
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 02:50 AM
  #19  
Three6GMC's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 27
From: Corpus Christi
Default

I do more street then track so 4wd down here is the way to go. What I run at the track is what I can put down on the street. Most 2wds won't put the power down like they can at the track so I'm always at an advantage there.
Reply
Old May 7, 2017 | 02:02 AM
  #20  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Three6GMC
I do more street then track so 4wd down here is the way to go. What I run at the track is what I can put down on the street. Most 2wds won't put the power down like they can at the track so I'm always at an advantage there.
I'll agree with you on that. It's just simply the fact that we now live in a world where 1000+ horsepower street cars can be built with relative ease.

I got a old Chrysler product with a 511 inch Hemi with Stage 5 **** that puts down a little over 500 rwhp that I drive on the street (pump gas, can idle in traffic on a 90* summer day type deal). I can leave a stop light with the tires on fire, or the equivalent of around a 1.50-1.60 60' time. This is really what I consider a street car (not a 1000+rwhp turbo/blown set up that tears up parts, is temperamental and out right stupid at full throttle on the street).

Everyone's opinion of what a street car is is different and the debate will continue forever. So for me, my Chrysler is a street car and it's motor belongs in a 2wd car chassis.

Sorry for the derail. I took the car to a drive-in meet tonight, so I feel like talking about it. lol
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.