FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hit the rollers yesterday...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #11  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Using the formula I was well over injector duty cycle with 550+ rwhp but the meth has been suplimenting. With the 60lbs'ers and the bap and even more meth I should be set well into my next engine build.
I thought about other pump setups but really dont want to limit my tankcapacity or run dual pumps.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #12  
Bill Reid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Ah... Meth. I do need to consider that as well.

Also, I forgot to mention that I run 1 32oz can of Torco for every fill up (91 crap gas) at the pump... and I usually put about 23 gallons in.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Yeah, I use Lucas
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #14  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Very nice!

Torque looks pretty darn good at 2500rpm, cant complain about 400ftlbs. You probably have a little better TQ lower than 2500rpm than the dyno sheet shows due to convrter flash and such, takes a second for everything to settle down. It's cool to see a smaller turbo make the TQ lower in the rpm band.

What I'm interested in is your "no ****" driving around town comparison between the two different systems.

Last edited by moregrip; Jul 15, 2007 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
ls1newbie's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

That's great! Congrats.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #16  
laynlow77's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, Ca
Default

awesome! i hope to drop my cam in mine as well soon.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #17  
Superado's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, Georgia
Default

great #'s...good luck...
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #18  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

You got yourself a strong truck Bill! Nice numbers!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:44 AM
  #19  
1SlowHoe's Avatar
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,962
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

I cant remember where I read this but...raising pressure to 80psi was not a good idea. I cant remember why I think it may have been a physical limitation on the FPR. However, I seem to recall LitRedDevil (Randy) was running higher fuel pressure with success. I guess I could use the search button but, I'm going to bed.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #20  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1SlowHoe
I cant remember where I read this but...raising pressure to 80psi was not a good idea. I cant remember why I think it may have been a physical limitation on the FPR. However, I seem to recall LitRedDevil (Randy) was running higher fuel pressure with success. I guess I could use the search button but, I'm going to bed.
because the pumps dont like the head pressure on them at higher psi.

R
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.