FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

guys with FMIC's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 05:34 AM
  #31  
slowec's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

Are you talkin 31 12 3 cooler as the core size cause thats what mine was. They called it a 31 12 3 but the core is 24 12 3. Just tryin to clarify. I went with the size I did because 5.5psi and stock cubes won't be in there forever and I didn't wanna have to go bigger later I think that TRT one is killer for people that can't fabricate or for those who wine about cutting the frame.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #32  
TURBHOE's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

no it has a 24x12x4 core on it. and what about that lower valance. if i put my IC down there it would get no flow. i dno't have a hole in it like that. but i did find a steel chrome aftermarket valance that did and it look pretty nice maybe i should get it.

Last edited by 4.8T; Aug 3, 2007 at 09:35 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #33  
TURBHOE's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

Originally Posted by 99RCSB
If you need 75 lbs per minute to get to your hp goal you would need 50 sq in of internal core flow. An 18x24 core would flow 54 sq in. With a 4" thick core you would have 13.5" of frontal flow area. A 3" thick core has 18" of frontal flow area. The 3" thick would dissipate heat faster due to the air being able to travel through the core easier.
ok my turbo is rated to flow 75lbmin / 960cfm. if i have a intercooler that is rated to flow 700cfm then what will that do? will it cause it to not cool so well? and why is a 4" thick have less frontal flow than a 3" and what if i had two small electric fans on the 4"? i found a ic that has a core of 24x12x3 vise the 24x12x4 but it drop down like 100cfm and rateing goes from 1000 max hp to 700 max hp. now i'm guessing that would be fwhp would this be enough to get me to say 550-600AWHP?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #34  
99RCSB's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Mount Vernon,OH
Default

I took into account 750 crank hp. When talking about intercooler thickness the second half of the intercooler only does 1/4th of the heat exchanging. The thicker the core the more the efficiency gains become less and less. The major problem with going thicker is the drag coefficient goes up. You can use the thicker core,but you have to be aware of these problems especially with intercooler placement. The thicker the core you have the harder it is going to be for the cooling air to pass through. If you had a way to make ducts to force air through it it could prove beneficial. If you are going to push your turbo to the limit you will want just a bit bigger than the 12x24. The electric fan idea is a good idea making use of the 4" core. I'd start measuring and find out what fits where you want it too.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #35  
99RCSB's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Mount Vernon,OH
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
What is wrong with too big? I don't seem to have any problems.
You have a whipple which is why you won't see very many of the negative effects.

Originally Posted by Quik
so would the mentioned 31x12x4 be good for my goal of 9xxrwhp?
Lets say the turbo your using takes 90 lbs/min to make 900 hp. You need about 70 sq in of internal flow. With out knowing the efficiency of the turbo at that range this is just an estimate. To figure out a intercoolers internal flow multiply the core length, width and number of channels. Usually channels are 1/8 in.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #36  
TURBHOE's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

well i think i'm going to do it behind the bumper/valance. i found an aftermarket valance that is steal/ chrome and it has a hole right in the middle. i don't want to go about moving the radiator and a/c core and all that. i did it for my d-max intercooler that i never got to use and don't want to do it again. so imeasured yesterday and i could fit the 31x12x3 or 4 and i could box the front of it in up against the valance hole to where the air coming through the hole can only go into the IC. if i did that would it be better to go 4". i can also put like 2 10" fans on the back side to help pull air for stop and go traffic.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #37  
99RCSB's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Mount Vernon,OH
Default

Yeah use the 4" as long as there is ducts and the fans would help dramaticly at low speeds.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #38  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Just put a 3" intercooler in my Avalanche today.It's pretty much infront of the radiator.Fit very easilly.Have some pics,will post them tomorrow.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #39  
TURBHOE's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

that front end has alot more room behind it than the one like mine. i want to do a front end conversion to the front end but i don't have the money for go fast and look good.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #40  
Superado's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, Georgia
Default

here's mine so far...
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...FMIC+should+be
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.