guys with FMIC's
#31
Are you talkin 31 12 3 cooler as the core size cause thats what mine was. They called it a 31 12 3 but the core is 24 12 3. Just tryin to clarify. I went with the size I did because 5.5psi and stock cubes won't be in there forever
and I didn't wanna have to go bigger later
I think that TRT one is killer for people that can't fabricate or for those who wine about cutting the frame.
and I didn't wanna have to go bigger later
I think that TRT one is killer for people that can't fabricate or for those who wine about cutting the frame.
#32
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
no it has a 24x12x4 core on it. and what about that lower valance. if i put my IC down there it would get no flow. i dno't have a hole in it like that. but i did find a steel chrome aftermarket valance that did and it look pretty nice maybe i should get it.
Last edited by 4.8T; Aug 3, 2007 at 09:35 AM.
#33
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Originally Posted by 99RCSB
If you need 75 lbs per minute to get to your hp goal you would need 50 sq in of internal core flow. An 18x24 core would flow 54 sq in. With a 4" thick core you would have 13.5" of frontal flow area. A 3" thick core has 18" of frontal flow area. The 3" thick would dissipate heat faster due to the air being able to travel through the core easier.
#34
I took into account 750 crank hp. When talking about intercooler thickness the second half of the intercooler only does 1/4th of the heat exchanging. The thicker the core the more the efficiency gains become less and less. The major problem with going thicker is the drag coefficient goes up. You can use the thicker core,but you have to be aware of these problems especially with intercooler placement. The thicker the core you have the harder it is going to be for the cooling air to pass through. If you had a way to make ducts to force air through it it could prove beneficial. If you are going to push your turbo to the limit you will want just a bit bigger than the 12x24. The electric fan idea is a good idea making use of the 4" core. I'd start measuring and find out what fits where you want it too.
#35
Originally Posted by MikeGyver
What is wrong with too big? I don't seem to have any problems.
Originally Posted by Quik
so would the mentioned 31x12x4 be good for my goal of 9xxrwhp?
#36
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
well i think i'm going to do it behind the bumper/valance. i found an aftermarket valance that is steal/ chrome and it has a hole right in the middle. i don't want to go about moving the radiator and a/c core and all that. i did it for my d-max intercooler that i never got to use and don't want to do it again. so imeasured yesterday and i could fit the 31x12x3 or 4 and i could box the front of it in up against the valance hole to where the air coming through the hole can only go into the IC. if i did that would it be better to go 4". i can also put like 2 10" fans on the back side to help pull air for stop and go traffic.
#40


