FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FI cam experts inside please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #1  
slowec's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default FI cam experts inside please

(224/220 @ .050, .581/.581 on a 116 LSA )

This is the bumpstick in question.

Wouldn't this be a good cam for a lq4/sts?
Would a stock 4l80e converter work with this ?
What springs would be best to use?

I know I have a lot of irons in the fire , but this is a used good deal

Thanks in advance!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #2  
quicksilverado's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, Ga.
Default

Whatever you do you will need a tq converter or you are gonna have alot of lag.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #3  
slowec's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

Are yalls typing fingers sore. I know some of you reading this have knowledge on this
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

cant say for sure but i can give you some perspective.

i have a 234/232 590/590 114+1

even with a 408 and a front mount turbo set up i consider that cam too large. it needs completely open exhaust(like no exhaust) and a free flowing exhaust side of your turbo to work well. i am 90% sure i would be happier with a cam in the range you just posted up.

if i were to build a 6.0 turbo set up especialy with a sts i would go smaller. i dont know how to calculate overlap but i would shoot for very little. there is going to be some back presure there and if you have some overlap it is going to hurt your power. larger cams are harder to tune and loose low end and slow the spool time on the turbo. all in the hopes of a more top end.

that being said it wouldn't suprize me at all if that cam kicked *** on your set up. , i wish i had the time and money to goto the dyno and try a pile of diferent cams just to see how they all reacted.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #5  
onebadrubi's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
i wish i had the time and money to goto the dyno and try a pile of diferent cams just to see how they all reacted.

Do you have any idea!!! how many people have said that about your setup? hahaha

Look into the 218/214 range. on a turbo cam i have no idea what a good LSA or overlap would be. I dont knwo the overlap formula off the top of my head. More overlap is normally only good on N/A setups.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: Newark, Tx.
Default

We have used a cam almost identical to that 226/220 .580's 115. It will work great. I dont prefer the reverse split after trying some different grinds in similar combos though.
We just put in a 228/228 .588 .588 116 in a car yesterday and it works very well.
Overall, the "cam in question" will do great in your truck.
David (quicksilverado) is right about the stall. If you dont have one, get one. You wont be sorry.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #7  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I'd think that cam would work just fine in your application. The stock 80E converter is pretty loose compared to some and for traction issue's it will probably be enough.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #8  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

What size turbo?

That cam may not be too bad since its on XER lobes, which are real aggressive. That means that those lobes have the advertised duration numbers more like a 220/216 cam on XE lobes. In simple terms, on that cam the valves begin to open at the same time a 220/216 .564 .561 cam would, it just opens them faster and more.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
quicksilverado's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
I'd think that cam would work just fine in your application. The stock 80E converter is pretty loose compared to some and for traction issue's it will probably be enough.
Mine was very tight. Booost would not hit good until 3500-3800 rpm. Which was about 35 mph. It was a dog until the boost hit. Running a 2800 stall now and boost hits hard aound 18 mph, which is perfect on the street.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #10  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I was pretty much judging it on how small of tires he runs. I'd guess that he could still load it up to 2-3psi on the stock converter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZO6Ted
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
9
Aug 12, 2015 07:50 PM
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Aug 7, 2015 09:55 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
THE TRUCK STOP
0
Jul 30, 2015 04:29 PM
signguy62
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
7
Jul 27, 2015 03:42 PM
4B11T
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
Jul 13, 2015 03:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.