exhaust cut out and a turbo
#12
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rick
#15
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hemet, Ca.
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the o2 sensors do correct fueling at WOT. they apply the same LTFT factor at WOT as they do in closed loop fueling. So while its barbaric, it still does provide some correction.
#16
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
That is true... Some fueling adjustments are done using long terms. But as stated it's barbaric at best.
I kind of always assume everyone running forced induction setups on these things is tuned open loop speed density. I know when I took the MAF and O2's out of the equation and started tuning only with a wideband, reading plugs, IATs etc, my fueling got more accurate and was far easier to control.
My opinion about the cutout thing is this... If you want it super quiet and run a fairly restrictive exhaust then yeah I can see having one, otherwise just run a free flowing exhaust system and let it be what it is...
I kind of always assume everyone running forced induction setups on these things is tuned open loop speed density. I know when I took the MAF and O2's out of the equation and started tuning only with a wideband, reading plugs, IATs etc, my fueling got more accurate and was far easier to control.
My opinion about the cutout thing is this... If you want it super quiet and run a fairly restrictive exhaust then yeah I can see having one, otherwise just run a free flowing exhaust system and let it be what it is...
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Makes sense. The motor will see the same boost level but becomes more efficient hence it is moving more air at a given amount of boost and becomes lean.
Rick
#18
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
I don't believe this is true. The O2's are only used in closed loop, as far as I know. As soon as you go WOT, or even into PE, the PCM goes into open loop. This is when a failing MAF sensor will rear its ugly head.
I've ran across this 2 or 3 times. Step on the throttle, go into PE, watch the scanner show the switch from closed loop to open loop, then watch left & right fuel trims go way lean. As soon as you lift, goes back into closed loop, and no longer lean. When I see that, I install my "known good" test MAF, and go for another drive.
Just my own thoughts & experience on the subject, trying to help.
For the record, I also believe that any force induction setup should have a 2 or 3 bar MAP speed density OS, instead of just a MAF.
#19
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
I don't believe this is true. The O2's are only used in closed loop, as far as I know. As soon as you go WOT, or even into PE, the PCM goes into open loop. This is when a failing MAF sensor will rear its ugly head.
I've ran across this 2 or 3 times. Step on the throttle, go into PE, watch the scanner show the switch from closed loop to open loop, then watch left & right fuel trims go way lean. As soon as you lift, goes back into closed loop, and no longer lean. When I see that, I install my "known good" test MAF, and go for another drive.
Just my own thoughts & experience on the subject, trying to help.
For the record, I also believe that any force induction setup should have a 2 or 3 bar MAP speed density OS, instead of just a MAF.
I've ran across this 2 or 3 times. Step on the throttle, go into PE, watch the scanner show the switch from closed loop to open loop, then watch left & right fuel trims go way lean. As soon as you lift, goes back into closed loop, and no longer lean. When I see that, I install my "known good" test MAF, and go for another drive.
Just my own thoughts & experience on the subject, trying to help.
For the record, I also believe that any force induction setup should have a 2 or 3 bar MAP speed density OS, instead of just a MAF.