FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

on the dyno .68 to .96 ar swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #11  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Wow I would of thought the top end would of been alittle more noticable with the .96! I'm plan on doing a similar test with my 6L + GT 76 and a .70 & .96 a/r housings. If this is a reflection of what's gonna happen I may just leave the .70 on there. Like the 1990's super detective said "100 extra HP at 65 mph sounds strong to me" too!
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #12  
PappyDan's Avatar
Tribe Shaman
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

jim i wonder what you would get if you swaped out the heads.
larger ports, larger valves, it would flow allot more.
damn i wish i was up there helping you work on this.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 01:42 AM
  #13  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

I was talking with someone that's a lot smarter than me today...(happens alot ) and they suggested the same thing. Could be the heads are maxed out flow wise and was the limiting factor. I had originally thought that the different A/R would make a bigger difference. After seeing this thread I had dropped the idea of trying this on my set-up but now think I will try it anyways, just to compare and see if my numbers reflect the same findings as Parish's.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluecollar Hotrods
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
11
Jun 11, 2024 11:37 PM
kush killer
FORCED INDUCTION
18
Feb 17, 2016 09:20 PM
kdw8888
FORCED INDUCTION
8
Jul 9, 2015 10:52 PM
Cowboy17
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Jul 9, 2015 08:22 PM
NuckenFuts
FORCED INDUCTION
32
Jul 9, 2015 08:45 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.