FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boost on 4.8 vs 5.3/6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2010 | 09:20 AM
  #1  
RSTinOKC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 383
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma City
Default Boost on 4.8 vs 5.3/6.0

I was reading on an F-Body board in a thread were a guy was entertaining the idea of swapping his 305 or 350 (I don't remember which) TPI for a 4.8.
Of course there were a ton of guys saying "go 5.3 or 6.0" but then I read this:

"The 4.8L has a rod ratio of 1.92. And it sports 12 degrees of piston dwell time. Meaning? The engine will respond better to boost than a 5.3 or 6.0 or ANY other LS series engine."

Is this statement true, and what exactly does he mean by respond to boost?
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #2  
bmatt86's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default boosted chevy/sierras!

I've talked to my bro wit his lt1 96 sierra wit a t4 turbo on it and we've ran 13s flat wit it at rocky mountain raceway and my bros friend ran a turbonetics kit on his 5.3 2005 chevy and it ran wit us all day on 15lbs of boost! But I've never heard of anybody boosting. A 6.0! I've got a 2000 seirra wit a 6.0 and idk what turbo to run I wanna run 8-20 lbs of boost so if any has got a idea hit me up! And I don't wanna run a sts cause I dri ve it daily! And I live where it snows a ton !
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 06:52 PM
  #3  
RSTinOKC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 383
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma City
Default

An old friend of mine was running a procharger @ 7lbs on his SSS w/stock heads and pistons, I thought it was pretty damn quick but I have no idea what it ran.

I think I know what the last part of my original question means...basically a 4.8 will yield more power (pound for pound) on equal boost than that of a 5.3, 6.0, etc, etc...can anyone confirm or deny? In other words if a 4.8 gains 100rwhp @ 7lbs others may only see 70 or 80...
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 07:00 PM
  #4  
Llaverito's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Roma, TX
Default

I ran 11.0@125mph 1.7x 60' with the 4.8 with a 220 cam stock heads and bolts. Truck weights 4200, the f-body will be lighter and with a great 60' low 10s are more than possible
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_Enpln7dmA
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #5  
RSTinOKC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 383
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma City
Default

ty Llaverito, amazing vid...
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 11:24 PM
  #6  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

I believe the 4.8 does respond better to boost than the 5.3 and 6.0. I have seen some amazing things done with a 4.8, and Llaverito is proof of one of them.
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #7  
SincalT/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Currently In suspense.
Default

Your theroy is right the only problem is you got to spin um up pretty high to get the power.Now what im saying is only relative when comparing equally equipped larger ci ls motors with a shorter rod to stroke ratio.I believe there's a chance you could get more all out power from a 4.8l though thats why i stuck with one.One things for sure the bar is set pretty high when it comes to ringing power out of a stock engine be it a 4.8,5.3,5.7,6.0 you really cant go wrong if the tunings on par.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lucas287
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
31
Jan 12, 2021 06:18 AM
GMCtrk
Drag Racing
38
Jan 27, 2016 06:47 PM
Justin87gn
FORCED INDUCTION
9
Sep 10, 2015 12:06 PM
06murder
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
Sep 4, 2015 03:54 PM
hackrst
FORCED INDUCTION
16
Sep 2, 2015 05:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.