Behold the 383 shortblock
#21
The piston spec sheet said the pistons are 3.9015 but they miked a little bigger than that. Sorry about the confusion, I was trying to describe the piston as advertised.
All the machine work was around $1100 and that included sizing the rods. Everything costs a little more in Canada, we have to pay for all that healthcare and unnecessary government, you know.
I'm not going to drill the lifter trays. I figured if it was that important then GM would have modded the Gen IV trays with holes in them. Although the trays are new, the plastic seems a little thin. I'd hate to weaken them any further, especially up here in such a cold climate. They serve a pretty important role and I don't want to compromise them.
All the machine work was around $1100 and that included sizing the rods. Everything costs a little more in Canada, we have to pay for all that healthcare and unnecessary government, you know.
I'm not going to drill the lifter trays. I figured if it was that important then GM would have modded the Gen IV trays with holes in them. Although the trays are new, the plastic seems a little thin. I'd hate to weaken them any further, especially up here in such a cold climate. They serve a pretty important role and I don't want to compromise them.
Last edited by swift700; 02-25-2011 at 10:30 AM.
#26
The quench pad is still there just smaller. Who knows if there is any benefit with that big of a dish and that small of a pad.....
#29
I got introduced to this subject on Yamaha RD engines and the squish band is small on them, but it does make a difference.
I guess I'm just thinking out loud here.
I think I'd talk to a professional engine builder about that, but I'd go for it.
#30
I did a recalculation. With a .040 head gasket I'd be looking at 9.92:1 CR with this engine. This seems like it's getting a little high for FI. Of course, the power out of boost would be better along with better squish. Can these engines run that CR with boost on pump gas?