FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another catch can question... slight oil smell at idle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:30 PM
  #21  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I meant the size of the feed. those chinese turbos have smaller center sections and don't need as much oil as a borg if you're running a -4 feed. You may need a restrictor.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:32 PM
  #22  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by lxcoupe
Don't you want engine vacuum drawing the crankcase pressure out of the motor?
The pressure doesn't need any help to get out of the crankcase. The only reason to route fumes to the intake is for pollution control, crankcase fumes are full of unburnt fuel. Prior to 1968, valve covers were vented to the atmosphere.
A vacuum pump will evacuate the crankcase and negative pressure in the crankcase helps the rings seal. I have always thought that having a vacuum pump would make oil mist collection more efficient, but I can't quite envision a system designed for maximum oil collection. Maybe the exhaust from a vacuum pump will improve the action of a centrifugal oil separator.
It would be nice to have an oil separating system that is efficient enough to allow you to send the fumes back to the intake, 100% oil free. You would never have the smell.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:41 PM
  #23  
lxcoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 22
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I meant the size of the feed. those chinese turbos have smaller center sections and don't need as much oil as a borg if you're running a -4 feed. You may need a restrictor.
Now that's an idea... any way a restrictor could hurt? Reading the forums I don't see a lot of mention on turbo restrictors, I see them mentioned quite a bit in the import world though.

The pressure doesn't need any help to get out of the crankcase. The only reason to route fumes to the intake is for pollution control, crankcase fumes are full of unburnt fuel.
Ok that makes sense. I plugged the turbo inlet elbow and I rigged up a little breather filter off a piece of 3/8" hose. I'll put some miles on this and make an assessment in a few days before considering doing 1 vented breather tank for both valve covers.

So to confirm, check valves are only necessary on MAF setups correct?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:44 PM
  #24  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

restrictors are quite common. read on tech
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:50 PM
  #25  
JordanH's Avatar
Restricted
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, Texas
Default

Restrictors are common mostly for ball bearing turbos... I'm sure a lot of those import guys run bb turbos so that's why you've read a lot about that.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:54 PM
  #26  
JordanH's Avatar
Restricted
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by lxcoupe
Now that's an idea... any way a restrictor could hurt? Reading the forums I don't see a lot of mention on turbo restrictors, I see them mentioned quite a bit in the import world though.



Ok that makes sense. I plugged the turbo inlet elbow and I rigged up a little breather filter off a piece of 3/8" hose. I'll put some miles on this and make an assessment in a few days before considering doing 1 vented breather tank for both valve covers.

So to confirm, check valves are only necessary on MAF setups correct?
On my Maf tune setup, I capped the intake line on top of the intake manifold and put two breathers on each valve cover and one on the oil cap... Never had a problem or oil smell... Every months or so I'll clean the valve cover filters, because they get a little messy.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2016 | 11:56 PM
  #27  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Ha, restrictors, I ran a freaking -6an to my turbo just to keep it happy



(BB turbos do need restrictors usually though)
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2016 | 12:01 AM
  #28  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

did you have low oil pressure or something? -6 is huge. Last I checked yours was just a standard 400
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2016 | 05:00 AM
  #29  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

Originally Posted by lxcoupe
Now that's an idea... any way a restrictor could hurt? Reading the forums I don't see a lot of mention on turbo restrictors, I see them mentioned quite a bit in the import world though.

So to confirm, check valves are only necessary on MAF setups correct?
No not always necessary. To much restriction and you will smoke the bushing in side if it's s JB turbo.
Depending on turbo they could already be restricted.
Look down the turbos oil inlet prior to installing the inlet fitting. There's should be a very small hole in the actual casting.

Now the drain needs to -10 or larger.

Simple way to build a restrictor is using nitrous jets.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2016 | 05:04 AM
  #30  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
Ha, restrictors, I ran a freaking -6an to my turbo just to keep it happy

(BB turbos do need restrictors usually though)
Several big turbos we sent out recommended -6 feed with a min -12an drain.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.