FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.8L forced induction?

Old Jan 24, 2007 | 09:17 AM
  #11  
adam1803's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 1
From: Tyndall AFB / Panama City, FL
Default

yeah, turbo is easier on the drivetrain usually
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #12  
DominionsCowboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Default

well then thats what im gonna go for because i want the power and not do as much wear and tear on thedrivetrain parts
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #13  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

A few points.

1. Look at the facts. The fastest and most powerful 4.8 was a turbo'd one

2. Turbos are not that much easier on the drivetrain. From my experiance (2-4l60e, 1-4l80e, 1-torque converter, 2-u joints, and 2- eatons) turbos are hard on the drivetrain. They hit very hard and it is then when stuff breaks. Obviosly if you take it easy and dont put a **** load of power throught them they will last longer.

3. Turbos are easily upgraded and they are a hell of a lot of fun.

I say spool the biatch
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #14  
wes00silverado's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Scotts Hill TN
Default

I'm in the same spot as you. I've got a 4.8L and I just wanna be able to beat stock GTs and maybe Camaros. Or atleast come close. So would STS or front mount be the way to go?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chevy305
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Sep 28, 2015 09:21 PM
Lthompson
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
Sep 21, 2015 04:34 PM
zraffz
FORCED INDUCTION
2
Sep 20, 2015 08:25 PM
racedad70
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
3
Sep 16, 2015 01:51 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.