Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

My new dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Fepony
My 4 door truck weighs in at 5300# last time out before new tune, i ran 7.6-7.8 1/8th mile. It should now run low 7's and low to mid 11's 1/4 mile.
nice times.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
tarinitup's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 1
From: Odessa Texas
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
theres quite a few extended cabs running low 12's with just n/a 6.0s and around 400hp and 400tq, so add another 164hp and 200tq and I guarantee you could shave off another second....
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
skolman91's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 58
From: muncie IN
Default

psi?
only thing i would be jealous of is that torque curve, or i should say lack their of a curve..
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #14  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

Originally Posted by tarinitup
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #15  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
theres quite a few extended cabs running low 12's with just n/a 6.0s and around 400hp and 400tq, so add another 164hp and 200tq and I guarantee you could shave off another second....
Originally Posted by tarinitup
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
Originally Posted by dlt76028
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
Fepony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: N.W. Florida
Default

Originally Posted by skolman91
psi?
only thing i would be jealous of is that torque curve, or i should say lack their of a curve..

I am currently only making 15 psi...the Whipple is good for 25.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #17  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.
I'm talking about a 2wd extended cab that weigh ~4500lbs. Not to mention your truck isn't exactly setup for all out track times. I could add lower gears and a bigger converter, smaller wheels and easily shave off three tenths without adding any HP

Last edited by dlt76028; Nov 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #18  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

agreed but neither is a Ford HD
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #19  
tarinitup's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 1
From: Odessa Texas
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
Spending money on hp instead of traction was my biggest downfall. Do you have any personal input from actual experience you can enlighten us with to go fast.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #20  
Fepony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: N.W. Florida
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.

I weigh in at 5500# with me in it and i think you are right on the money as far as my 1/4 mile times. I don't have 1/4 mile strip nearby so it was a guess.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.