Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

LQ4/L92 06 Sierra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 10:55 PM
  #1  
97 Z Me Go's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee Wisconsin
Default LQ4/L92 06 Sierra

Well did a build for towing on my 06 sierra. Truck has cadiallac 22s on it. 3:42 gears. 4x4 truck. Put a yank 2600 stall in. LQ4 bottom end with Ported l92s. Custom cam from predatorZ. UD Pulley and Gm Cold Air.

Truck put down 358/374 thru stock manifolds stock y and stock cat-back.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
norris_83's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Default

hmmm, seems a tad low... what are the specs of the cam? and wat intake you running?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #3  
97 Z Me Go's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee Wisconsin
Default

I think its because the stock exhaust. It has the l92 intake on it. 214/218 cam
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:24 AM
  #4  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

with LT headers and exhaust, i bet you'd be 400/400
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #5  
joeyc125's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Cedar, MN
Default

That doesn't seem low at all to me. He is dynoing with 22's on it, which have proven to lose a little. He also has l92's on an lq4 which is fairly low compression and is running stock exhaust. Actually seems pretty good to me. Thats around what hirdlej was putting down with higher compression, full exhaust yada yada yada and through a 5 spd vs his manual. Looks pretty decent.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #6  
norris_83's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Default

it's not a bad number! with a 214/218 it is a healthy number
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 02:21 AM
  #7  
007gmc's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: memphis tn
Default

damn could have just done lt's and left the stock heads on for way less $
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #8  
joeyc125's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Cedar, MN
Default

Lt's arent going to get you even close to the 350rwhp mark.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
007gmc's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: memphis tn
Default

Originally Posted by joeyc125
Lt's arent going to get you even close to the 350rwhp mark.
check my sig mine makes 340whp on a stock cam just lt's if it had his cam in it im sure it would make well over 350whp on my stock 317 heads
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #10  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Yours is not the norm at all. I could only get 305 with LTs
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
3
Oct 28, 2015 08:24 AM
03regcab sierra
Drag Racing
28
Oct 1, 2015 08:53 PM
nickrench3
New Members
6
Sep 17, 2015 08:48 AM
Closer_2001
GM Parts Classifieds
1
Sep 16, 2015 11:46 AM
the owl
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
0
Sep 4, 2015 04:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.