Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

L92 370ci GM carb intake VS L76

Old Aug 22, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #11  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

I have long tubes and full 2.5" exhaust with an x pipe.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #12  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Dyno racing is for ****** get that thing out to Steele

Looks like you made a wise choice
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #13  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

good to see it made it to dyno unlike mine but to be honest im highly dissapointed. i would of thought for sure you would of been 450 or so

i still not a believer at all of those heads and yoru case is one for sure. seen 6.0s make more then that with a cam
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 03:08 AM
  #14  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
good to see it made it to dyno unlike mine but to be honest im highly dissapointed. i would of thought for sure you would of been 450 or so

i still not a believer at all of those heads and yoru case is one for sure. seen 6.0s make more then that with a cam
From the SOTP I can't tell that i've lost a lot on the low end with the L92's or if they pull that much harder above 4500. I'm really thinking that a ported set of 317's and LS6 intake would yeild similar if not more peak and definately more on the low end. There are too many LS2's with just a cam and headers putting down better #'s and I have more compression than them.

But with 50* ambient and 5 more degrees of timing I could see picking up to the mid 400's. You really have to take the IAT's, timing, heavy *** wheels, 5.13's, and 116 LSA into consideration. The #'s won't peak like a tighter LSA would. I chose my cam for a smooth driving truck and not a dyno or track queen. A GTO with 3.42's, lighter wheels in the winter would definatly dyno higher with my engine in it. I say that because mine was done in about the worst of air quality conditions. I'll re-dyno this winter and see how things change.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 03:12 AM
  #15  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

One good thing to know is the huge heads and wide LSA cam should come alive on the jug!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #16  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
From the SOTP I can't tell that i've lost a lot on the low end with the L92's or if they pull that much harder above 4500. I'm really thinking that a ported set of 317's and LS6 intake would yeild similar if not more peak and definately more on the low end. There are too many LS2's with just a cam and headers putting down better #'s and I have more compression than them.

.
i have to agree with you on the 317s and ls6 intake. Ls2s do bury that number well with a cam with less compression
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #17  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Hey Gibbs, how much timing are you running, I just finished tuning a guys 402/l92 setup with the L76 intake, and a 242/247 cam on about 11.0:1 comp. I noticed that those heads do seem to like more timing. His ended up at about 31-32*. Maybe with the intake temps down some, you'll get that power back.

On the carb intake, did you have a 90 and an elbow, or a 4bbl tb? I think that the carb intakes are going to require a bit different cam setup to compliment them from what I've been reading over on Tech, we'll see......Patrick G is specing a cam for the Wood Haulers, NA 408 with the Victor/4bbl setup. I really can't wait to see what he comes up with for it.

Congrats on the numbers!

Last edited by Rhino79; Aug 28, 2007 at 10:07 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #18  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

I had the Hi oct set at 31-32 but something in the tune was holding it back to 25-26*. I havent' taken the time to look into what is holding it back. I figure it would do better with more timing. Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
Hey Gibbs, how much timing are you running, I just finished tuning a guys 402/l92 setup with the L76 intake, and a 242/247 cam on about 11.0:1 comp. I noticed that those heads do seem to like more timing. His ended up at about 31-32*. Maybe with the intake temps down some, you'll get that power back.

On the carb intake, did you have a 90 and an elbow, or a 4bbl tb? I think that the carb intakes are going to require a bit different cam setup to compliment them from what I've been reading over on Tech, we'll see......Patrick G is specing a cam for the Wood Haulers, NA 408 with the Victor/4bbl setup. I really can't wait to see what he comes up with for it.

Congrats on the numbers!
I had a 90* elbow and the 90mm DBW TB.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 09:49 AM
  #20  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

re-dyno'd and added graphs above.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.