Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

Dyno numbers.

Old Feb 23, 2012 | 10:57 AM
  #1  
youngbuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: warner robins, ga
Default Dyno numbers.

I recently had my truck dynoed truck has 3.42s an lq9 with a tbss intake, 862s with ferrea 2.02 intake and 1.57 exh valves, titanium retainers, multi angle valve job.. milled .030/ now have a 58cc combustion chamber , also has a tune. Truck is 4wd with a 4l80 an silvy ss rims 275/55/20. Truck made 283rwhp an 351ft lbs. I thought the numbers are kinda low was wondering what yall thought. I believe it was a dynamics dyno, I can make sure later today. Thanks for any thoughts.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:00 AM
  #2  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

Dyno should be used to compare numbers after a modification. Correction factors and stuff can skew the numbers.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #3  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

Also that dyno works best for turbo applications. It reads lower than most other dynos out there since its a load bearing type.
I only put down something like 350hp on one with a turbo lq4 on 6psi.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:08 AM
  #4  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

Do you have the chart?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #5  
youngbuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: warner robins, ga
Default

Yea I do. I always have trouble getting pics on here tho lol. Would my tall tires also make the numbers lower?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

i was posting from my phone and it sucks to go back and edit the post so i just posted new ones

Last edited by nonnieselman; Feb 23, 2012 at 04:49 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

tq looks ok, but hp numbers looks only a little better then a stock 5.3 Even with the 20's and 80, I would have though it should make more. What kinda times have you went in the 1/4?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
youngbuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: warner robins, ga
Default

It hasn't ran the 1/4 since I got the 4wd working. I did a 15.3 at 93.8 with a 2.45 60ft lol, that was 2wd easing off the line so I wouldn't spin and before the heads an tbss intake. I would like to be around a 13.5 now, think I am?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #9  
06Sierra2's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: el paso, tx
Default

hp def seems low, are that cam and headers in your sig installed? who did the tune? also, just curious as to what you scr is with flat top pistons and milled 5.3 heads?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 04:01 PM
  #10  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Some thing is mix matched or the tune is just horrible. That truck with a stock 6.0 should go in the 14's by it self. The obs trucks are lighter then the newer ones also. Hell my truck in the sig went high 14's with a hypertech, lt's, cold air, with the 4.8.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.