6.0L 5-Speed Dyno Day Today
Oct 11, 2008 | 11:27 AM
#121
good numbers, hirdlej
i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.
do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.
do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
Oct 11, 2008 | 11:31 AM
#123
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
good numbers, hirdlej
i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.
do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.
do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
Oct 11, 2008 | 04:27 PM
#126
TECH Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Wow, I should have posted my guess. I had guessed 350/380, just didn't post it. Did you log your dyno run? I'm just wondering how much timing you were running and if you'd had any KR*. I was thinking it would have peaked at 5500rpm, but it's not much off that. If I had to guess your cam has a +4 advance also?
Oct 11, 2008 | 09:01 PM
#127
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Wow, I should have posted my guess. I had guessed 350/380, just didn't post it. Did you log your dyno run? I'm just wondering how much timing you were running and if you'd had any KR*. I was thinking it would have peaked at 5500rpm, but it's not much off that. If I had to guess your cam has a +4 advance also?
I didn't log it per se' put I DID command 27 degrees total advance on my best run. Any more or less and I lost power. 27 degrees was optimal. My cam has 2 degrees of advance built into it. I've never been one to "race dyno's" BUT if my data is accurate, I'm kind of frosted by the fact that a bone stock LQ4 with long tubes and a TR224 would have more average torque than my high comp, ported heads 6.0L.
Oct 11, 2008 | 09:14 PM
#128
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
My AFR was perfect after a few hours of tuning with the stock narrowband. When I got to the dyno, I verified it with the wideband. The spark advance was all that was needed to tweak. I got a 10 RWHP jump in power and a 10RWTQ jump in twisting force from going from 34 deg total advance to 27 deg total advance.
Oct 11, 2008 | 09:58 PM
#129
I didn't log it per se' put I DID command 27 degrees total advance on my best run. Any more or less and I lost power. 27 degrees was optimal. My cam has 2 degrees of advance built into it. I've never been one to "race dyno's" BUT if my data is accurate, I'm kind of frosted by the fact that a bone stock LQ4 with long tubes and a TR224 would have more average torque than my high comp, ported heads 6.0L.
