5.3+torquer V2
#23
You Rookie You should run this cam, you'd be in the 9's by now
#24
You wanted dyno numbers so here you go. Keep in mind, these are engines with more cubes so they are going to make more hp than a 5.3. To get the 5.3 in these ranges you will need a F A S T intake and headwork.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dyno-benc...sstimates.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...3-90-90-a.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...h-9-4-11s.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dyno-benc...sstimates.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...3-90-90-a.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...h-9-4-11s.html
Last edited by viciousknid; May 18, 2009 at 03:58 PM.
#25
#27
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
well all I can say is your not going to run better at the track, but on the street it should run pretty good with the m6 compared to an auto, scott work on your base running airflow to get it to idle better, I know mine would of ran better with a new converter but hey bluecajun5.3's truck runs pretty good for what it has done to it.
Dyno is for tuning purpose only and dyno queens, like lance I only put down 330hp and tq ahaahaa
Dyno is for tuning purpose only and dyno queens, like lance I only put down 330hp and tq ahaahaa
#29
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
From: Concord, NC
i have no running issuedswith my 228R cam in an auto what-so-ever. mine put down 351rwhp/338rwtq SAE with mod in sig, on a dynojet, though i personally think they are a bit inflated. i'm thinking more around 330/300 judging from track time etc.
#30
If your truck was a drive by cable, I'd ask to see parts of your tune. Mine needs alot of work





