Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

300hp RWHP "SAE"

Old May 9, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #11  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
What a stupid question.
Chill bro, not stupid at all :nunchuk1:

I dyno'd just over 303 SAE rwhp with intake and catback with my l33iirc. Roller dyno numbers will vary with gear and tire size, right?
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #12  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

elaborate on this. If i went to the dyno and istead of using my 20's I used a 16-17" tire I may show an increase in power according to the dyno? I often wonered about this. Give me a little more on this, please.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #13  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

yeah, I think Nelson did a test on this a few years ago on an AV. It gained something like 45hp just from a tire change.....anyone remember the specifics?
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #14  
viciousknid's Avatar
Where's the Beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 1
From: Dover, Oklahoma
Default

My LM7 with Tune, Transmission, 3:42's, Full Exhaust, and 275/45/20's made 280whp/290wtq on a Mustang Dyno.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #15  
lukesdad04's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sandy Hook, Ky.
Default

I went back to the dyno about a week ago and took a set of 16 inch wheels with 265/75/16's and gained 28 rwhp over the 20 inch wheels with 275/55/20's. I just wanted to see what a difference it would make. When I had my truck dynoed the first time with the 20's the guy said it would have made more power with some 16's and he was right!! When I buy some drag radials I'm going to get some 28 inch tall ones on a 15 inch rim.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #16  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
yeah, I think Nelson did a test on this a few years ago on an AV. It gained something like 45hp just from a tire change.....anyone remember the specifics?
I read the test on a forum a few months ago.. cant remember which one it was.. Dont he have a forum of his own??
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #17  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

yes LS1Truck but this test was a few years ago for sure.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #18  
mred's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Wylie,Tx 75098
Default

now that i can be more specific (i guess)
i knew there would be a few that would be dumb founded or floored by the question because they prolly spent a bunch of coins and went just over 300 RWHP by a small margin
i put my truck on the dyno, i was showed "SAE" level. the tuner told me that to him "SAE"was what meant the most to him, as far as HP levels are concerned, as a tuner.
my truck put down 255-298 to the rear with a "tune only".
3.73s 275/45/20s new plugsTR55s ,msd wires, a "WIX" paper filter and a new wix fuel filter.
A/F at 13.3-13.6.
at 12.4-12.6 it did 260-281 but was detonating at 5200 on up.
my next option of making some more power was doing "electric fan" and "cat-back"
i dont see why 300Hp could not be achieved.
i just thought it was a legit question and a achievable goal.
GM has always lied about their the HP from the factory.
thanks
Ed

Last edited by mred; May 12, 2009 at 05:12 AM.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #19  
blackbeast ss's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: LA AND LAS VEGAS
Default

well all dynos are NOT created equally.... Dyno Jets (over inflated numbers) are only good for WOT sweeps and have zero load on the rollers therefore put out bigger numbers. A loaded dyno (tuners choice dyno) ie dyno dynamics. etc, put a load on the rollers which help for steady state tuning and more accurate real world rwhp/rwtq numbers, not inflated numbers
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #20  
blackbeast ss's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: LA AND LAS VEGAS
Default

Originally Posted by mred
now that i can be more specific (i guess)
i knew there would be a few that would be dumb founded or floored by the question because they prolly spent a bunch of coins and went just over 300 RWHP by a small margin
i put my truck on the dyno, i was showed "SAE" level. the tuner told me that to him "SAE"was what meant the most to him, as far as HP levels are concerned, as a tuner.
my truck put down 255-298 to the rear with a "tune only".
3.73s 275/45/20s new plugsTR55s ,msd wires, a "WIX" paper filter and a new wix fuel filter.
A/F at 12.3-12.6.
at 13.4-13.6 it did 260-281 but was detonating at 5200 on up.
my next option of making some more power was doing "electric fan" and "cat-back"
i dont see why 300Hp could not be achieved.
i just thought it was a legit question and a achievable goal.
GM has always lied about their the HP from the factory.
thanks
Ed
you are actually wrong... obvisously the hp/tq ratings are at the true flywheel (engine dyno) not real wheels... input your drivetrain loss (approx 25% depending on your setup) and you have your correct wheel hp/tq
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.