Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

1st dyno of S369sxe 4.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 10:28 AM
  #11  
Fullpower's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 484
Likes: 76
Default

Vertical axes don't line up.
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 11:31 AM
  #12  
fastjweb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Fullpower
Vertical axes don't line up.
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
It is a blast. I run mickey et street Rs on street. 28 x 11 17s. It will still spin from 60. Run Hoosier 28 x 10 slicks on 16" rims at track. Just converted rear brakes to run a 15 though.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 02:11 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 104
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by fastjweb
I thought around 22%, but I could be wrong
If you go by NHRA factorung... 10.39 / 5.825 = 1.7837, 1.7837 X 1.7837 X 1.7837 = 5.675, 4250 kbs / 5.675 = roughly 750 flywheel HP. This works only if all the planets are aligned... efficient converter, dead hooks, etc.

22% drivetrain loss would be about 585 RWHP... not sure if this can accurately be applied to turbo vehicles .
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.