Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

***6.0L Dyno results***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default ***6.0L Dyno results***

Well her you go. Temp was 70 deg, and DA was a sweltering 8630'. I decided to run the pulls in 3rd gear with the converter locked. I really wish I had the .96 AR you can see by the pK HP @4500RPM that Im really getting choked up top. I managed 16PSI with the boost controller all the way up. I have a 14PSI spring in the w/g. Injector duity cycle was @96% AFR 11.8-12.1, timing was at 17deg. 91 octain with 25% E85 mix. No meth. Made 581HP/693.3lbs uncorrected raw power. Corrected to sea level was 712HP/850lbs. While they were strapping it down on the dyno, I over heard them laughing about the mid 11sec 122MPH Gtech passes like they thought I had a suprise comming. After the 1st pull I saw jaws droppThey were all floored to say the least. They dynoed a few procharged, trucks that made 330-350, and a few hopped up cobra mustangs that made 350,s.

Mesured numbera @6200'/8600DA


Corrected to sea level
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
99LoweredSierra's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Thats some serious power!! Congrats man!!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #3  
BLASTER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: bridgwater, nj
Default

that's pretty sweet good job
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #4  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Thumbs up

Ah yes, Very Nice!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
macs406's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: roy, utah
Default

Those are some good numbers, I only hope I can even get close to that.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #6  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

very sweet, when you going to bring it down to sea level again?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:40 PM
  #7  
99LoweredSierra's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Do we see a intake swap coming soon?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Thanks Guys! The correction factor looks like about 1.22 which is a little on the high side for a turbo charged engine. They usually don't use corrected numbers. I just requested them. They just go off the mesured numbers because everyone around hear runs at a 5800' track. I seldom see people running ET's that reflect there corrected numbers. I think it would make 640-670HP measured measured at sea level.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #9  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
very sweet, when you going to bring it down to sea level again?
I will most likely have it down ther this summer, for some shitty sea level air LOL. I will have to turn it down to 12psi or so because im out of fuel now.. Should make around 580-600 down there with 12-13PSI. I think 16PSI might go
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #10  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Make sure you give me a heads up when you come down and I'll get some video for ya!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.