Drag Racing Fastest Truck List inside, sortable for any make/model/engine listed.
TIME SLIP DATABASE

I cant believe the power difference.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 02:03 AM
  #11  
Suddog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Guam
Default

Originally Posted by outlawz2004
Just checked userCP, nothing there LOL. I guess on this site a mod does have to do it. I remember a thread where you had to post your time slip in order for them to put "14 second club" or whatever time bracket your in.
The video is below. I can provide details for the da calculator if needed. The SUV I ran was a WRX Forrester XT.

Sure enough guys, no replacement for displacement. Even the FI/NOS guys can agree with that statement.


Last edited by Suddog; Mar 26, 2011 at 02:10 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 05:20 AM
  #12  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

Glad your happy with your swap man!

I could tell a difference in bottom end when i swapped from my 5.3 to my 6.0. The sound is more throaty too, 6.0's sound good!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 05:46 AM
  #13  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by Suddog
...no replacement for displacement. Even the FI/NOS guys can agree with that statement.
Nahhh...not necessarily.

Congrats on your newfound times and power!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 06:31 AM
  #14  
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Isnt forced induction a "displacement extension"?? lol

Anywho awesome mod.. Gotta love the 6.0
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 07:36 AM
  #15  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Suddog
Sure enough guys, no replacement for displacement. Even the FI/NOS guys can agree with that statement.
]
I love displacement but FI is a clear replacement. No need to argue but it is a fact. There is a reason no body uses big blocks anymore.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 07:39 AM
  #16  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Why are your brake lights on at half track?

P.S. Stop before the beams. hahaha I did that my first time to the track but never again.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:05 AM
  #17  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

what was your da that night?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:35 AM
  #18  
Suddog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Guam
Default

Originally Posted by custm2500
I love displacement but FI is a clear replacement. No need to argue but it is a fact. There is a reason no body uses big blocks anymore.
I knew someone would bring this up... If you suck the air in 6 liters at a time or force 6 liters of air into a 4.8 you still have more displacement right? More air means more displacement right?

I think nobody builds big blocks anymore because there is not that big of a market to support the big blocks. Big blocks are few and far between in the automotive manufacturing industry. Trucks with the big blocks were a middle ground between the 6.0 and the diesel. The torque produced was not fuel efficient at all. With that much torque, why not just spend the extra 4 grand and buy the diesel and get better gas mileage and torque.

Originally Posted by custm2500
Why are your brake lights on at half track?

P.S. Stop before the beams. hahaha I did that my first time to the track but never again.
Half way through track is the end of the 1/4. Then another 1/4 mile for braking. We have a short track. Also LED tail lights are bright no matter what.

Originally Posted by AndysC3
what was your da that night?
DA was 2503

Last edited by Suddog; Mar 26, 2011 at 08:41 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:51 AM
  #19  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

wow, I figured you wouldof been a little faster with the converter and cam. I went 14.78 with a da of 3500 with the boltons in my sig. What does your truck weigh in at?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:55 AM
  #20  
RibeiroBJJ's Avatar
Praise The Lowered
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 2
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Nice runs...The reason imo that big blocks are obsolete is 1) Diesels and 2) With the redesign of the small block , we now have a raised cam etc. and more room to get the same cid out of a small block while retaining decent milage and a weight savings..Not to mention it saves GM a lot of money focusing on one line of v8's
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM.