Close race at the track!
05-12-2017, 12:27 PM
#11
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
05-12-2017, 12:28 PM
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
I think the RCSB guys with traction which is the biggest issue for them and where the 4wd is really helping me are running mid to low 13s tune only.
05-12-2017, 08:02 PM
#13
TECH Junkie
I've heard of 13.60's but that has been quite a while guess they are faster now 
I ran 9.16 @ 75 (RCSB) the only time I took it out stock with 750 miles on it. E85 in 4wd. I had added the drop in bed liner and F1 Backflip so maybe 125 lbs on top of no weight reduction. These DI engines are definitely a plus in performance but I'll sure be glad when the price comes down like the ls engines have. So expensive to do mods.
I ran 9.16 @ 75 (RCSB) the only time I took it out stock with 750 miles on it. E85 in 4wd. I had added the drop in bed liner and F1 Backflip so maybe 125 lbs on top of no weight reduction. These DI engines are definitely a plus in performance but I'll sure be glad when the price comes down like the ls engines have. So expensive to do mods.
05-13-2017, 07:51 AM
#14
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
I've heard of 13.60's but that has been quite a while guess they are faster now I ran 9.16 @ 75 (RCSB) the only time I took it out stock with 750 miles on it. E85 in 4wd. I had added the drop in bed liner and F1 Backflip so maybe 125 lbs on top of no weight reduction. These DI engines are definitely a plus in performance but I'll sure be glad when the price comes down like the ls engines have. So expensive to do mods.
I ran 9.16 @ 75 (RCSB) the only time I took it out stock with 750 miles on it. E85 in 4wd. I had added the drop in bed liner and F1 Backflip so maybe 125 lbs on top of no weight reduction. These DI engines are definitely a plus in performance but I'll sure be glad when the price comes down like the ls engines have. So expensive to do mods.