Anyone Using the 295 50 16" MT Drag Radials?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 15, 2009 | 11:54 AM

dug

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 3,727

Likes: 0

From: Phoenix

Anyone Using the 295 50 16" MT Drag Radials?

Its 27.7" tall and has a 10.8" tread width. Looks like it would provide a lot of traction without being too tall it lowers the gearing. And the 16" rims should clear the brakes right?

Jun 15, 2009 | 05:32 PM

getonit

TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 348

Likes: 0

From: Alma, Ga

I see they have the ET street radial 2's in that size. What is the difference with the street radials 1? Looks like the same compound.

Jun 15, 2009 | 05:59 PM

silver-mod-o

Hunt&Fisherator

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 14,314

Likes: 17

From: SETx

sounds like a good choice for a bolt-on truck...

Jun 23, 2009 | 11:48 AM

tommy1005

Launching!

Joined: May 2009

Posts: 241

Likes: 0

From: Katy, TX

I think the only difference is the tread pattern. Not sure which is better, but both are pretty sticky from what I've heard.

Jun 23, 2009 | 08:10 PM

dug

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 3,727

Likes: 0

From: Phoenix

I saw a post about a 9second turbo t/a running the 295 40 17's. Hooked enough to sky the fronts

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

c10 Ls, with 325/50/15 ET problems

kainzien

Drag Racing

Nov 10, 2023 11:37 AM

01 c3 ecsb awd 6.0 turbo

turbo6c3

Trucks and SUV Classifieds

Oct 5, 2015 06:11 PM

Heads/cam/intake lq4

Slammed silverado

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Sep 28, 2015 06:14 PM

2015 Drag Week live coverage

BlackGMC

Drag Racing

Sep 21, 2015 01:48 PM