Drag Racing Fastest Truck List inside, sortable for any make/model/engine listed.
TIME SLIP DATABASE

Any ideas on ET?

Old Mar 22, 2016 | 03:01 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 106
From: FL
Default

Just went back and looked, my previous 2000 RCSS went 10.041 @ 71.29 MPH, stock other than heavy 18" wheels. Was around 4400 lbs, 5.3/60E/3.73s rated 285 HP.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 08:24 PM
  #22  
LOBO2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
Just went back and looked, my previous 2000 RCSS went 10.041 @ 71.29 MPH, stock other than heavy 18" wheels. Was around 4400 lbs, 5.3/60E/3.73s rated 285 HP.
So do you think my truck is where it should be considering the extra weight of being a crew cab & also a 4wd?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:10 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 106
From: FL
Default

Hard to say, it's .4 quicker than the magazine ran with a stock truck. (16.8) I suppose .4 isn't bad for the limited mods. But I thought there should be more ET gain from revised shift points and removing TQ management.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:17 PM
  #24  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
Just went back and looked, my previous 2000 RCSS went 10.041 @ 71.29 MPH, stock other than heavy 18" wheels. Was around 4400 lbs, 5.3/60E/3.73s rated 285 HP.
That seems about how it should be for a good running truck.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:32 PM
  #25  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO2
What do you think my truck should be running in the 1/8 or 1/4 with its current mods of Black Bear Auto-Cal tune 91 octane, Airaid M.I.T., AEM dry panel filter (oem/factory type), and Magnaflow 3" SI/SO 14" case muffler?
The only thing close to a baseline that I have is that 2004 Car & Driver article that showed a Silverado Z-71 identical to mine (same gears, engine, trans, and even tire size) that ran a 1/4 time of 16.8 sec.

How much of a difference should I expect from the BB Auto-Cal 91 octane tune?
Really hard for me to say and by no means do I mean any disrespect whatsoever. I seem to recall that I saw new era on the project thread .7 (1/4) just from a tune although it was 2012 5.3 4wd & 6pd. I think it was 15.9 to 15.2 iirc bone stock. I know your tune is probably less aggressive but with the muffler and the intake I would've thought a bit better. Wish I could be more helpful I'm just thinking the tune is a bit off.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 02:26 PM
  #26  
LOBO2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
Hard to say, it's .4 quicker than the magazine ran with a stock truck. (16.8) I suppose .4 isn't bad for the limited mods. But I thought there should be more ET gain from revised shift points and removing TQ management.
Me too really. This is my first time with a tuned vehicle so I really don't know what to expect.

I've had faster vehicles (77 Luv 13.2's & 68 Nova 11.8's), but they were all carbed ie simple, lol!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 02:34 PM
  #27  
LOBO2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Really hard for me to say and by no means do I mean any disrespect whatsoever. I seem to recall that I saw new era on the project thread .7 (1/4) just from a tune although it was 2012 5.3 4wd & 6pd. I think it was 15.9 to 15.2 iirc bone stock. I know your tune is probably less aggressive but with the muffler and the intake I would've thought a bit better. Wish I could be more helpful I'm just thinking the tune is a bit off.
No disrespect taken at all friend. I really appreciate the help from you and everyone.

I re-read that New Era build thread last night, and he did see a significant drop in E.T. with his tune. Awesome truck too!

BB's website said they're out of pocket this week (by phone), so I guess I'll call them next week.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 03:49 PM
  #28  
fastjweb's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default

I had a 05 crew cab 2wd 5.3. I had 4.56s, magnaflow muffler, shortie headers, cai, and superchips tuner. I eventually did more things to it, but in this config it went 14.79 at 93 mph, and dynoed 279 rwhp on 20s. i think it ran 9.4s in the 8th at 74 if i remember. Your heavier. To compare that truck, my bone stock crew max tundra ran 14.6 at 93 lol.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 08:17 AM
  #29  
LOBO2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

Well, first off I feel like a dope because the time slips I posted in post #12 of this thread I made WITHOUT having installed my Black Bear 91+ Octane tune! DOH! That's what I get for being technically challenged. I thought the tune was installed but come to find out it wasn't and it was completely my fault.

Now I get to go back to the track to see what difference the tune made since it is installed now. I can't wait to see what it'll run now as it feels like a completely different truck with the tune installed! I just have to wait for another 61*F day to go, which will be a while.

So...this is what my truck had done to it when the following passes where made. For whatever reason the 1/4 trap speed wasn't working. Temp was 61*F. Like I said, she's fat and slow.

2004 Chevy Crew Cab Short Bed Z-71 4wd 5.3L LM7 / 4L60E / 3.73 gears

Magnaflow Muffler # 11229 3” SI/SO
AEM Pro Flow Dry Air Filter (oem panel style)
Airaid M.I.T.

left off idle,

Name:  Hub%20City%20March%2020%202016%20Pass%20003_zpsanmqpbwl.jpg
Views: 86
Size:  176.8 KB

left @ 1,200 rpm,

Name:  Hub%20City%20March%2020%202016%20Pass%20004_zpsbyq1errj.jpg
Views: 75
Size:  184.1 KB

Last edited by LOBO2; Jul 30, 2016 at 09:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 01:17 PM
  #30  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 106
From: FL
Default

Go run it, correct ET for weather. What does the butt dyno say? Does it feel noticeably quicker?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.