Drag Racing Fastest Truck List inside, sortable for any make/model/engine listed.
TIME SLIP DATABASE

07 Tundra 1/4 mile video inside...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #41  
mikecheat04's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Natchitoches, LA
Default

Originally Posted by KB
I agree, I think it'd be cool for them to have a forum spot. It's always nice having more friendly competition at the track!
Friendly??? lol j/k
We need to set up a track meet one of these days!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #42  
jaegmc99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Bako,CA
Default

I'm not very into the look, but your truck is running great bro! My 99 in stock form with 20's ran a 15.2 best in 90 degree weather. Doing the headlight mod, less tire psi,a lil weight reduction, and 70 degrees netted me a 14.8. I can't believe these stock trucks run a 14.1!! thats awewsome. I see it very possible because my FJ Cruiser with the 4.6 V6 can run a 15.6. get some mods and race a WRX!!

Last edited by jaegmc99; Aug 29, 2007 at 02:06 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #43  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 07Sport
You guys have been asking for one, so I finally found one. Its not my truck, but its the same configuration. This guy is a member on tundrasolutions and the video speaks for itself...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrRlDCIZDvs

Little info on it, the Tundra is 100% bone stock, over 1/2 tank of gas, no weight removed, no tire psi change, and had the VSC turned off. Best run of the night was 14.181 but he didnt get it on video. Corrected time on the 14.181 run was 13.83 @ 99.67mph. Hes hopin with catback/cai and weight removal to be in high 13s, and perhaps some dr's to hit mid 13s.
You arn't supposed to correct for DA'. That race track in LA is only 200' above sealevel. That is already a very low elevation track to begain with. A reg cab tundra runs mid 15's up hear@5800'. Which is still impressive for a stock truck.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #44  
07Sport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by stock48
You arn't supposed to correct for DA'. That race track in LA is only 200' above sealevel. That is already a very low elevation track to begain with. A reg cab tundra runs mid 15's up hear@5800'. Which is still impressive for a stock truck.
Well, Im by no means an expert on it, I just posted what had been said elsewhere. Thats gotta drive you guys crazy up there.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2007 | 03:45 AM
  #45  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 07Sport
Well, Im by no means an expert on it, I just posted what had been said elsewhere. Thats gotta drive you guys crazy up there.
Im sure the truck will run mid- high 13's @ that track with cool air, and some minor weight reduction. I don't want to come across as an ******* face. I just get sick of these magazine editor *******'s correcting for DA' plus every inch of elevation . People give us **** up hear when we try to correct our ET for elevation only . We are at 5800' but regularly have a DA of 9000'-11000'. Take that 15.40 sec, tundra I saw,and use our track correction factor which is ETx.9276 you get @14.28 which is about right. Now if you correct for 10,000'DA which is ETx.87 you get 13.4. To get that at sea level you would have to run it off a cliff! It's not that bad raceing hear because everyone slows down about the same amount. Except for FI, and N20 they loose very little.

Last edited by stock48; Aug 31, 2007 at 03:58 AM. Reason: Can't spell worth a shit.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #46  
It'llrun's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: N. FL
Default

That's quick for stock, period!

There are only two things I dislike right off about the current Tundra. They claim it will tow more than I believe it safely can(based on chassis) and the price is still more than the worth. I've been looking for a new pickup the past few weeks and I like the Toyota, but not THAT much. I may end up with a Nissan if it comes down to price. Problem is, they aren't really strong for towing.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 10:34 AM
  #47  
fastgraphite04's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Fast for stock for sure. My best is 13.97 with all my mods, 3.55 gears and in 85 deg. heat. Granted I'm 4 wheel drive but cooler weather is just around the corner. I raced a 4x4 version against mine and they're no slouch's. Nice video bro.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #48  
Mr.Slowhoe's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: LIberty, NC
Default

dammit im a chevy man but I like those tundras
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #49  
Mr.Slowhoe's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: LIberty, NC
Default

Lol I just seen that duribility test and that tundra was shaking that thang haha. Chevy needs some more R&D in that gas door!
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #50  
markislive78's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default

Nice times guys......I should have some numbers for my 6.2L here shortly once the track opens....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.