Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS2 truck intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2005, 06:50 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS2 truck intake

Assuming all issues such as connecting the fuel rails and injectors to the existing fuel system, wiring up the new TB to the existing harness, and putting together a CAI, does anyone think that a LS2 truck intake manifold and 90mm TB would be of any benefit on a heads/cam 5.3?

I have heads on the way, and may upgrade to a bigger cam, just looking for a way to squeeze all available hp out of this thing N/A. I've also considered swapping to a LS6 or FAST 78, but the additional work to get the accessory drive out of the way is too much, plus everyone says that power will be lost in the low rpm range.

If I could find an intake manifold used, or if anyone has the part number, I'd be willing to try to figure this out and test it for the truck community.
Old 12-18-2005, 07:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
mattrem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: W.Long Branch,NJ
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tom are you talking about the intake on the Trailblazer SS?
Old 12-18-2005, 07:58 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, it's also on LS2 equipped SSRs. There was one for sale here a few months back. I should have jumped on it.
Old 12-18-2005, 08:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
mattrem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: W.Long Branch,NJ
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard that it only has a bigger diameter on the TB side then gets smaller on the inside. I know Big Tex had talked about this before. I haven't heard of the intake making a big difference, I dont think anyone has tired it though. I know Allen Nelson told me he saw a 10-15 HP gain with the Fast 90/90 combo on a 408.
Old 12-18-2005, 09:07 PM
  #5  
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
 
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'd like to know more info. on this also...
Old 12-18-2005, 10:23 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
CrabhartLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Suffice to say the LS2 intake is not an upgrade, even to an LS1. They don't flow that well.
Old 12-18-2005, 10:32 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
Suffice to say the LS2 intake is not an upgrade, even to an LS1. They don't flow that well.

Yes, I know that the car LS2 manifold is not that great compared to even a LS6 manifold, but what about the LS2 truck version v. regular truck intake?

Matt, the FAST 90/90, do you know if that was v. a regular truck manifold?
Old 12-19-2005, 02:27 AM
  #8  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

1200 for 15hp sucks IMO. I think that this conversion wouldnt be worth the time/money it would take to do it but if you feel you must get some dyno numbers please.
Old 12-19-2005, 05:25 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
1200 for 15hp sucks IMO. I think that this conversion wouldnt be worth the time/money it would take to do it but if you feel you must get some dyno numbers please.
I'm not taking about a Fast 90/90 swap. A complete LS2 truck manifold with fuel rails went for $275 on ebay. So add in the $400 (conservative) for a TB plus incidentals and we're between 700-800 bucks. Still not cheap, but maybe there is additional performance to be found in this intake. Maybe not so much for me, but what about stroker guys like you? I love how people are so quick to dismiss a new idea without a logical reason why. This is what hot rodding is about - trying new things and exploring every option to get the maximum performance from your vehicle.
Old 12-19-2005, 05:33 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
5.3 racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: sw. pa.
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

part number for intake is: 89017588. $310 at gmpartsdirect.com


Quick Reply: LS2 truck intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.