Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2014, 03:52 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
zero2sixT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Deer park, TX
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Beyond 6k. Below 4800 the mid makes more hp and tq. This was with a 383, so if you have a smaller engine the mid rise should prove to be even more beneficial. On 400 + CI engines I think the high rise would be the bet. Thats just my .02
I still want to run the hi ram on my 6.0. Less cubes, but the 6.0 has a bigger bore. And mine has better heads than ported 706s. Wtf is up with that anyway? Why did they swap out the trick flows? And why didn't they try the 102mm on the 383?

These comparisons are always cool to see. But they almost never apply to what I'm running. Pretty much muddied the water for me.
Old 01-07-2014, 03:54 PM
  #32  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 374 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oakley6575
The mid rise is a dual plane intake vs the single plane hi rise.

Has anyone seen the mid rise intake without the top plate on? Its pretty cool looking
I think you nailed it on this one...

Results indicate a single plane vs dual plane has a larger effect than runner length.
Old 01-07-2014, 06:29 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
 
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 37 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

thanks for posting this and making me spend more money on my 6L build....lol
makes the decision easier for me tho, mid rise it is
Old 01-09-2014, 06:26 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
lsxperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Waverly, Ne
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since people keep saying it here is mid rise...
Attached Thumbnails Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results-image.jpg  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:32 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
lsxperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Waverly, Ne
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And here is the high rise. Holley will have mid rise ls3 intake this 1/4. They currently have just the cathedral. I bought both...
Attached Thumbnails Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results-image.jpg  
Old 01-09-2014, 08:03 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
 
RoadKill03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The high ram worked flawless on my 5.3
Old 01-09-2014, 08:25 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
skeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: P.A. TX
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RoadKill03
The high ram worked flawless on my 5.3



yeah it did, just cant justify the dual plane working to well at high rpms
Old 01-20-2014, 11:02 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
 
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 37 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I have a chance to buy a hi rise, it will be going on my 370 in my big truck. I will be upping the cam. should I go for it or just get a mid rise
truck is a DD but gets driven hard and I shift at 6700
motor will be getting sprayed aswell
Old 01-20-2014, 11:30 AM
  #39  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,315
Received 222 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

wouldnt a dual plane intake call for a different cam that a single plane??? which makes the results useless there are cam companies on tech that claim that with the correct cam, a single plane can have the same low end as a dual plane with the up top gains that are typical of a single plane. lower ICL to encourage higher velocity (or some **** like that lol). which is my my single plane setup is 110lsa on a 106 ICL vs a typical 112-114 lsa on a 108-110 icl of a dual plane or gm efi intake.
Old 07-23-2016, 11:30 AM
  #40  
Teching In
 
TBRyoungndumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Towndsend,Ga
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well testing these intakes on the same camshaft is not accurate. If I test the low rise on a cam that makes power from 3500 to 7500 Rpms your not gonna see the full benefit of this intake. When your building an engine your cam torque converter and intake should revolve around the weight of the vehicle it's going in. Forged 370 06 RSCB Silverado.


Quick Reply: Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.