Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

GM Supermatic Trans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2010, 09:22 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Gordy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default GM Supermatic Trans

In the latest issue of the GM Parts Performance catalog there is a new Trans available. Not sure of the cost but they do give a 12 month warranty. The 4L60E/65E were only rated to 380 ft-lb of torque and the new one is suppose to be considerably higher.

If the price is reasonable (sic), this could be a good replacement for someone who wants to drag race and not worry about rebuilds.
Attached Files
File Type: doc
gmpp SuperMatic trans.doc (67.5 KB, 158 views)
Old 01-20-2010, 09:38 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I figure if it's GM, it's at least $2500, maybe $3k. I couldn't read that P/N either, only made out 5 or 6 numbers. Noticed they said u need TCU P/N as well.

Nice to know their realizing we need a step up. I thought the 60E was 360Tq. rating, but I've been wrong before. Could be rated higher on the 65E tho.
Old 01-20-2010, 10:22 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
3DTIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Quality KY.
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is a stock 80 tq at?
Old 01-26-2010, 08:53 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
oldred95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3DTIM
What is a stock 80 tq at?
I believe its grossly underrated at 440 ft lbs. I say grossly because they are severely handicapped by the insanely soft stock shifts. They put the 80e behind the 8.1 in the Avalanches and Suburbans and the duramax in the G vans (actually a 4L85E).
Old 01-29-2010, 12:38 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Dgrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think 440 is under rated to much i was pushing 500 through my 1500HD with a 80e and it didn't last very long.

I always thought that the 8.1's had the allison behind them cause i know for sure my 02 2500HD truck did
Old 01-29-2010, 09:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
oldred95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dgrown
I don't think 440 is under rated to much i was pushing 500 through my 1500HD with a 80e and it didn't last very long.

I always thought that the 8.1's had the allison behind them cause i know for sure my 02 2500HD truck did
For the power they are capable of handling its under rated.

Well I think the 2500 Suburbans and Avalanches have a different chassis then a 2500 truck does. I know the half ton chassis are different and maybe that got carried over to the 2500 SUVs so the 80E was an easier option to make it all work.
Old 01-29-2010, 09:42 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

the 4l80e is rated at 440 lb ft in a 8000lb vehicle! Consider that they can be swapped into a 4500 lb truck and you'll see it's consistent with people's findings that they hold 600+ HP in stock form.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Texas5.3_1251
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
12
03-05-2016 08:10 PM
CammedZ71
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
11
09-09-2015 02:05 PM
11MPG
New Members
6
09-08-2015 04:52 AM
Mark_k
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
09-07-2015 10:15 PM
MadDMax66
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
0
09-05-2015 01:27 AM



Quick Reply: GM Supermatic Trans



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.