Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Need help getting IDC% down..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #11  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

oh i know, i am not saying the maf is worthless under 4K. Just not worth beating yourself up over when it comes to tuning it. Screwing with MAF tables in idle and just off idle areas can be a ball buster for some. So I always suggest just worry about higher hertz, areas that you are in PE, not closed loop. This is where we can dial in the commanded afr on a MAF tune. VE can take the rest down low IMO, maybe not others, but mine.
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #12  
ridnlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Default

thanks for the help guys.. great explantions.. I know what i need to do now.. ive tuned VE with wideband before but never MAF so I will so some reading on that.. I did not know that the maf took over after 4000 rpm I thought ve did.. learn something new every day
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #13  
KySilverado's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 7
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Your MAF is reading 62 lb/min at your 6300 1-2 shifts. With my blower I only see about 56 lb/min at 6000. I don't know but that would be a lot of air flow for your setup. If you are indeed flowing that much you don't have enough injector otherwise the MAF tables are screwed up?

EDIT: I compared your MAF tables to mine and stock 6.0 MAF tables. Yours is much higher. I believe this is a big part of your problem. MAF reporting much more air flow than you actually have and trying to fuel for it.

Last edited by KySilverado; May 21, 2007 at 05:11 PM.
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 05:57 PM
  #14  
ridnlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Thanks KySilverado.. I will take a look at it when I get home..
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #15  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by KySilverado
EDIT: I compared your MAF tables to mine and stock 6.0 MAF tables. Yours is much higher. I believe this is a big part of your problem. MAF reporting much more air flow than you actually have and trying to fuel for it.
Originally Posted by me earlier
your maf table is almost double of what the stock 6.0maf is in your trouble areas. I am guessing you have some extreme maf values in that area.
yep i agree...bad maf values.
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #16  
Country Boy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,044
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

wow...

get the wideband hooked up, tune the MAF/ VE tables and be done. Its simple with HPT.

Commanded should ALWAYS be what you want. If you want 12.8, command 12.8 and it should match up unless you need tuning.
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #17  
ridnlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Aight guys.. got it down to 83% by going back to stock MAF tables.. all the while commanding 12.7 and getting 12.7.. Thanks a ton for the help.. I am going to post up log I just made with the MAF table fixed..
Attached Files
File Type: hpl
injectors2.hpl (208.8 KB, 61 views)
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #18  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by ridnlow
Aight guys.. got it down to 83% by going back to stock MAF tables.. all the while commanding 12.7 and getting 12.7.. Thanks a ton for the help.. I am going to post up log I just made with the MAF table fixed..
You should notice alot more power as well. Look at your histogram #1 table, notice you aren't at the bottom any more, the calcualtions are a little more reliable/accurate now. .76 g/cyl instead of 1.2 g/cyl like in your old scans. So you are seeing some higher spark and leaner fueling at WOT now. Glad to see you are on the right track.
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #19  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

btw, when you say you are getting 12.7...where are you getting that number from? Your wideband ALWAYS says that in your scan, leading me to believe it's not hooked up properly yet.
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #20  
ridnlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Default

I was just saying based on PE table I am commanding 12.7 and in my log it is showing commanded = 12.7.. My wideband wont be hooked up for a few more days Truck feels alot stronger... thanks again for the help
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.