Fast and Furious
#13
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
I have to say it was alot better than I expected!
ACTING = SUCKS (expected)
ACTION SCENES = Totally unbelievable (anyone notice what was missing on the Subaru when it flipped over in the last scene)
STORYLINE = Not that bad
PLOT = Pretty good
I'd say it was about as good as the first one.
ACTING = SUCKS (expected)
ACTION SCENES = Totally unbelievable (anyone notice what was missing on the Subaru when it flipped over in the last scene)
STORYLINE = Not that bad
PLOT = Pretty good
I'd say it was about as good as the first one.
#15
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: upstate,NY
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Def good as the first one.Of course Jordana brewster is HOTT.I couldnt wait to get outside cause i heard a bunch of imports bouncing the rev limiter.At that point i was thankful i have a love for trucks.
#16
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was a nice adrenaline rush movie. Over the top like you can expect from Hollywood, but still fun, and it's always nice to see classic american muscle cars on the big screen.
While I love watching stuff blow up, I have no idea about the instability of NOS. Anyone know enough to elaborate of what it takes to blow up NOS and what it looks like when it blows? That looked like a gas explosion to me. It was still a bit more believeable that say those old A-Team TV shows where every explosion including hand grenades blow up like a big can of gasoline. ha ha.
While I love watching stuff blow up, I have no idea about the instability of NOS. Anyone know enough to elaborate of what it takes to blow up NOS and what it looks like when it blows? That looked like a gas explosion to me. It was still a bit more believeable that say those old A-Team TV shows where every explosion including hand grenades blow up like a big can of gasoline. ha ha.
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Independence, VA
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm definetly no expert, and I am just going off or what I THINK I know, but isn't NOS really close to laughing gas they use at like the dentist(if they do still use it). Isn't it just capable of holding ALOT more gasoline in it mixture than air alone. I might be wrong, but it shouldn't have been flamable. Correct me if I am wrong.
#19
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pulled this direct quote from Wikipedia:
"In vehicle racing, nitrous oxide ..... allows the engine to burn more fuel and air, resulting in a more powerful combustion. The gas itself is not flammable, but it delivers more oxygen than atmospheric air by breaking down at elevated temperatures"
"In vehicle racing, nitrous oxide ..... allows the engine to burn more fuel and air, resulting in a more powerful combustion. The gas itself is not flammable, but it delivers more oxygen than atmospheric air by breaking down at elevated temperatures"
#20
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Independence, VA
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pulled this direct quote from Wikipedia:
"In vehicle racing, nitrous oxide ..... allows the engine to burn more fuel and air, resulting in a more powerful combustion. The gas itself is not flammable, but it delivers more oxygen than atmospheric air by breaking down at elevated temperatures"
"In vehicle racing, nitrous oxide ..... allows the engine to burn more fuel and air, resulting in a more powerful combustion. The gas itself is not flammable, but it delivers more oxygen than atmospheric air by breaking down at elevated temperatures"