lets get political
#11
Originally Posted by Tiburon
We should have never been there in the 1st place.
#12
First things first.
There are just as many fat *** airmen as soldiers, and sailors, I know I am one.
Second. If somebody sucker punched your sister what would you do? You'd hunt down that dirty son of a bitch and slit their throat.
Same concept, except theres more sisters and children involved.
There are just as many fat *** airmen as soldiers, and sailors, I know I am one.
Second. If somebody sucker punched your sister what would you do? You'd hunt down that dirty son of a bitch and slit their throat.
Same concept, except theres more sisters and children involved.
#13
Originally Posted by Tan327
I think the war is stupid, nuke Iraq and call it a day. All of those people over there are acting like they're on our side and so innocent, if they were winning this war and had total control they wouldn't think twice about killing all of us.
Screw em' all, they've already said over and over that they hate us Americans! I say we leave and let them kill each other, as long as they don't bring it over here again.
I have a question though, why is it that we bomb their **** and then pay to have it rebuilt?!
Screw em' all, they've already said over and over that they hate us Americans! I say we leave and let them kill each other, as long as they don't bring it over here again.
I have a question though, why is it that we bomb their **** and then pay to have it rebuilt?!
Matt (white1) said nearly the same thing when we were talkin at the bar in BR. He daid, "its probly not the best answer but it is a solution." I couldnt agree more.
#14
I agree with ya'll; level it off with a nuke. The only problem is that politicians don't have the cajones to do this and most are too concerned with popularity polls than what is the quickest, safest, most effective, and economical way to solve this. Making those camel-riding countries a flat piece of dirt would be too quick and easy; there wouldn't be anything for the media to bitch about then. They'd probably have to go back to showing the squirrel that water skis 5 times a day instead of bitching about why we are doing the right thing and kicking some ***.
#15
yeah a nuke is a quick solution...but war is good for our economy and the 9/11 attack hit our economy hard. war opens up jobs and work is what makes it happen. most of the people over there are innocent. they have no contact or know zero terrorists. they may still hate us/our religion/how we live or whyever they hate us, but they werent the one who sucker punched us and shouldnt be punished.
but if all else fails NUKE EM lol.
oh, and i agree politicians have no nuts. god forbid we **** off a couple hippies instead of satisfying what the majority wants.
but if all else fails NUKE EM lol.
oh, and i agree politicians have no nuts. god forbid we **** off a couple hippies instead of satisfying what the majority wants.
#16
Nuke em....hrm, anybody stop to think about what Nuking them would cause after the fact?
I'm not talking about just with the fact that we nuked them but other countries.
Some of them do hate us ya know.They also harbour terrorist all the time.
If wee nuked them then you suddenly have every world leader getting together tot alk about the threat that WE have become.
If we can't restrain from nuclear war against them whats stoping us from doin the same to the rest of the world that does not want to addopt our way of life.
I mean think about it.Any world leader that may or may not be on our side will instantly fear us and people do very rash things when afraid.
Basically the act of us doin so would cause to much of a concern to have someone else attack us even if just out of fear for not striking first.
I don't think it would be a good move.
The war as is is the way to do it compared to breaking out the nukes.
It's not just them to worry about once you cross that line.It's everyone who fears you COULD do the same to them.
I'm not talking about just with the fact that we nuked them but other countries.
Some of them do hate us ya know.They also harbour terrorist all the time.
If wee nuked them then you suddenly have every world leader getting together tot alk about the threat that WE have become.
If we can't restrain from nuclear war against them whats stoping us from doin the same to the rest of the world that does not want to addopt our way of life.
I mean think about it.Any world leader that may or may not be on our side will instantly fear us and people do very rash things when afraid.
Basically the act of us doin so would cause to much of a concern to have someone else attack us even if just out of fear for not striking first.
I don't think it would be a good move.
The war as is is the way to do it compared to breaking out the nukes.
It's not just them to worry about once you cross that line.It's everyone who fears you COULD do the same to them.
#17
I still don't believe there was a correlation between Iraq and terrorism prior to 9/11. The U.S. tried to justify this war based Iraq having WMD and not for promoting terrorism against the U.S. Almost 4 years laters after going in and still no WMD to be found..
Afghanistan, now that is another story. I am glad we went in there kicked the **** out of the Taliban's.
Afghanistan, now that is another story. I am glad we went in there kicked the **** out of the Taliban's.
Originally Posted by TXsilverado
so you want to fight the war over here? terrorists declared war on us, and we took it to their soil. thats the only correct move IMO.
Last edited by Tiburon; Sep 21, 2006 at 01:14 PM.
#20
Originally Posted by Tiburon
I still don't believe there was a correlation between Iraq and terrorism prior to 9/11. The U.S. tried to justify this war based Iraq having WMD and not for promoting terrorism on the U.S. Almost 4 years laters after the going in and still no WMD..
Afghanistan, now that is another story. I am glad we went in there kicked the **** out of the Taliban's.
Afghanistan, now that is another story. I am glad we went in there kicked the **** out of the Taliban's.
They have found chemicals used in biological warfare. But we have proof that they used those chemicals on their own people in testing. And if they were so innocent why did the deny UN inspections so often? Why did they have mobil labs? I feel we did the right thing, and are still doing the right thing.






