PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

I can't fabricate?

Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #171  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

I'll be using 200mph tape to put the yokes on
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #172  
one fast ss's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: sudbury ontario
Default

Originally Posted by outlawz2004
lets just hope it doesnt come to this.

LMAO Dude your article is funny as hell!
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:16 PM
  #173  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..

Nevermind, don't, this will cause you to try and build something else... And spend more than $100... My best advice, keep the stock ****, put fresh pads and rotors all the way around and move on to finishing this throttle body of yours.. I'm getting bored making fun of your front brake delete project.
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:21 PM
  #174  
custm2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..
.
I think I have said about 15 times I plan to just look for lighter calipers for the front as the final product. I guess you over looked all of those posts just trying to be an *** and only project your opinon.
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #175  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

Just my opinion.... Rriiiiigghttt... I've gotta go to bed, I'm going to be hungover enough as it is, and they let me work on peoples vehicles for a living so I probably should sleep this off hahaha...

I did read about your lighter calipers as a back-up plan or something, but all I could keep reading over and over was about a truck with no front brakes..
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #176  
Three6GMC's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 27
From: Corpus Christi
Default

Lol alright alright let's just close this thread and just wait for the final products...
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:32 PM
  #177  
1989k1500's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
[


Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
In all seriousness... To maintain braking, improve braking, and save weight, why not go to some nicer calipers and rotors up front and consider driveline braking for the rear one rotor and caliper stops both wheels... Less weight, more efficient, more mechanical advantage etc..
Do they even use driveline braking on anything fast?

I've always been told it was a bad idea for anything other than a mud or trail truck. If you have 4.10 gears a rotor on the pinion will be spinning 4.1 times faster than if it were at the wheel.
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #178  
custm2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Monster trucks run drive line brakes. They are fairly fast 60-70 but weigh a million pounds. They are often red hot in freestyle.

Not sure if the extream weight vs. high speeds cancel each other thus it should work just fine if they do.
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:42 PM
  #179  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

It's mainly used on vehicles with a lot of rotational mass. So you're correct but I could see the advantages for someone wanting to save weight on a street truck... Would it really be worth it?? Probably not, I was mainly throwing info around to be a little helpful I guess... I know I've stepped on the guy's tiny feelings this evening a little... I know on a friends truck I've driven with a BBC, rockwells, 52" tires, some ungodly gear and a lot of power it stops that thing like right now :now: But I know that's apples/oranges to what were discussing here.
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:43 PM
  #180  
HuskerZ71's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Omaha
Default

Originally Posted by custm2500
Does anyone have the ability to calculate how much friction it would take 4000 lbs from 100 mph to 0 mph? This is the physics needed to determine an answer if it would be possible for the rear tires to offer that much friction.
This is kind of difficult to do on assumptions. I think the proper thing to do is find the coefficient of friction friction for the surface you will be on (race track) first. You can then calculate the distance it will take your truck to stop from 100 to 0mph given its mass and % of braking applied. On normal conditions this is used by giving the vehicle 100% braking but in this case it is kind of difficult to determine what the % would be. I would imagine the number is pretty low.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.