New Members Come in and introduce yourself.

R/T's are slow

Old Jul 6, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #11  
DirtySouthR/T's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Lenoir NC
Default

Originally Posted by RooKnute
Damn Gods trucks are all over this place!!

Thankfully I dont drive one! 5.2 all my granny *** can handle hahahaha


hey J
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 09:06 AM
  #12  
TigerFan187's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

What do stock R/T's really run?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #13  
RooKnute's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Default

Originally Posted by DirtySouthR/T
hey J
Hey hey!!


Tiger, ones I've seen ran 15.20's in the quarter. It all depends on what year and what cab from what I've seen. The newer R/T's had more HP than the older ones.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #14  
bad360rt's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
Default

Originally Posted by TigerFan187
What do stock R/T's really run?
Mine ran 15.3 stock, 15.0 with a throttle body upgrade. Got it down to 14.8 with an intake and catback exhaust, then I decided to get really crazy with it Most Regular Cabs are in the low 15's, a few have cracked 14's stock, Club Cabs are usually mid 15's, with a few hitting low 15's.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #15  
Five9Dak's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Default

Mine ran 14.8 with an fipk and slapper bars. They say the fipk is worth liek 12hp. So if your a good driver a Regular cab can sneak into the 14s bone stock.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 10:58 AM
  #16  
Five9Dak's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Default

BTW- the newer R/Ts are slower then the old ones. More restrictive exhaust and torque management in the ecu prevent them getting off the line real quick.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #17  
TigerFan187's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Thanks for the #'s! Torque Management
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
RooKnute's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Default

Originally Posted by Five9Dak
BTW- the newer R/Ts are slower then the old ones. More restrictive exhaust and torque management in the ecu prevent them getting off the line real quick.
But they had more HP, didnt know they were slower cause of that other computer crap!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #19  
DrewzR/T's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Default

Originally Posted by TigerFan187
Thanks for the #'s! Torque Management
I agree on that one! TM has owned me since I bought my shizzle. Not anymore cuz I get my PCM back tomorrow! woo hooooo

I'm hopin to cut a high 13 before I open up the bottle! We'll see very shortly!

Originally Posted by RooKnute
But they had more HP, didnt know they were slower cause of that other computer crap!
Ya dude check out my quarter times and trap speeds. My 60'ers (usually a 2.2) are just horrible and thats with slicks and no wheel spin.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #20  
DaPurpleRT's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

Mine ran 15.2@91 stock spinning Like crazy. 2.2 60ft on bald RSAs. Oh, also had 200lb of Mopar hard tonn eau and Mopar bedliner.

Ran 14.5@94 with headers and PCM, again spinning, but on bald Nittos this time. Yes, I did tend to run tires bald, I did so with the Nittos until it put me into a bridge in the rain. Eek.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.