Zo6 Cam?
#31
TECH Veteran
Are you serious? This is why I hate the internet. Maybe you should call Scoggin Dicky and run that by them. A 2002 and later ZO6 cam needs 7.450 pushrods. And yes genius total valve lift will be effected by trying to run stock length rods. 7.4 rods will probably work at the expense of lifter durability. I think you should go be an engineer for GM cause if you woulda told em that their standard 7.4 length pushrods were fine they could have saved millions in engineering and parts manufacturing expenses.
With a 3600 stall, 175 shot, drag radials, cam, tuning, and built trans you ran a 13.1. I'm not sure just how happy you should be with your setup.
#32
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
if you have a solid lifter and do not adjust the rocker to take up the slack then yes you will have less lift. the hydrolic lifters take up the diference and you will get full lift even with the smaller base circle.
that being said i would still go with the longer pushrods for the 02 and newer cam. i have seen a couple of posts around here that lead me to belive you might miss out on some power by running the preload too close to one limit or the other.
for a NA 2001 zo6 cam i would go with just the cam and the yellow springs.
for a NA 2002+ zo6 cam(smaller base circle) i would go with the cam, yellow springs and longer pushrods.
if either one of those set ups were boosted i would skip the yellow springs and go with the patriot golds or some other high quality spring.
not sure if it would be worth spining that cam past 6500rpm on the NA set up but if you planed on trying that i would go with the patriot gold springs just to help offset the heavier valves. i dont think that cam will want to spin that high but maybe you are out of gear or something and plan on spining it a little higher than you normaly would just to get thru the lights. if that is the case and you think you will be up there in the rpm range then i would go with the better springs, along with some other parts...
#34
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the point... there will be NO lifter preload if the pushrod doesn't even touch the rocker arm, as with one that's .4" too short. Unless you can come up with an LS1 valve lifter with an extra .4" of overall length.
#35
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll run 7" pushrods, no problem! Just give me .300" taller lifters, deck the block and heads a total of .100 In all honesty, that would probably make more power as long as the pistons don't bump the heads.
#37
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You sound like a knowledgable source running 14's. But we run the 1/4 mile here. I would say your a valvetrain expert running ls6 springs with the cam in you sig. It's amazing how knowledgable idiots sound when they have 3300 posts. Maybe you should spend some more time in the shop and less at your computer you might learn somthing valuable first hand. If anybody actually read the first post, What was in question was using stock lm7 pushrods, which is not a good idea. If your gonna buy pushrods anyway why not buy the right sized ones. And by the way it was a 13.19 @ 102 on a bone stock baby cam only motor with a 150 rwhp shot, first time out this year. Since it's run in the twelves. But my life doesn't revolve around trying to impress **** ant moran's that are to cheap to buy proper valvetrain components.
#38
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would watch who you are talking to there, and no your times are not impressive. Zippy ran that pass with the stock cam and just a CAI, cat back and tuning. He will be running close to your trap speed with the cam swap lol, even with the LS6 springs.
I built a cam only 6l with a 6speed in a rcsb 2000 Silverado that trapped 108 with 20" Boyd's. On a 150 shot he would go 118+.
Also before you start on me I built a tuned the 3950lb GTO that went 10.662139.83 with a stock Lq9 long block save for valve springs. 825whp, that the highest gen3/4 numbers yet on a stock long block. I am not just a interwebs warrior and neither is Zippy.
I built a cam only 6l with a 6speed in a rcsb 2000 Silverado that trapped 108 with 20" Boyd's. On a 150 shot he would go 118+.
Also before you start on me I built a tuned the 3950lb GTO that went 10.662139.83 with a stock Lq9 long block save for valve springs. 825whp, that the highest gen3/4 numbers yet on a stock long block. I am not just a interwebs warrior and neither is Zippy.
#39
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, forgot I built and tuned chris B's, 2003 Silverado SS.
Lq9, ls6 cam, 7.400" PUSH RODS, and dual golds
656whp@14psi
11.8@119 @19psi, 5800+lb race weight with 22" wheels.
Lq9, ls6 cam, 7.400" PUSH RODS, and dual golds
656whp@14psi
11.8@119 @19psi, 5800+lb race weight with 22" wheels.
#40
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
And by the way it was a 13.19 @ 102 on a bone stock baby cam only motor with a 150 rwhp shot, first time out this year. Since it's run in the twelves. But my life doesn't revolve around trying to impress **** ant moran's that are to cheap to buy proper valvetrain components.
just messing with ya but you are being pretty confrontational, tossing out the "idiot" name and all. your talking down to some smart guys and it is making you look bad. entertaining though so keep it up if your want.