What does this mean?
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if a proffessional machinist was recommending to you not to use them, would you tell them to go ahead and stick them in because the internet said they'd be ok?
How do you tell a guy with 25+ years of experience of building all kinds of engines, from stock to pro comp., that he doesn't know what he's talking about???
How do you tell a guy with 25+ years of experience of building all kinds of engines, from stock to pro comp., that he doesn't know what he's talking about???
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Casino, CT.
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002C5COUPE
How do you tell a guy with 25+ years of experience of building all kinds of engines, from stock to pro comp., that he doesn't know what he's talking about???
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joshluther
You don't, but he probably doesn't use to many USED factory parts in his race engines.
I'm sure he's used a used piston or 2 before. He's not an internet machinist.
#14
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002C5COUPE
I'm sure he's used a used piston or 2 before. He's not an internet machinist.
Its like if I bought a 84 Chevy Silverado, and it has 250,000 miles... Why did the tranmission go after I only drove it 20,000 miles???
This does not pass the common sense test
I am no machinist, internet or not, but I do not feel that the pistons are unuseable for the reason you stated. You should have no problem selling them here or on eBay if you do not want to use them. I know a few people that can get you a set of LS2/LQ9 pistons and rods for a good price....
but they are used.
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
Originally Posted by 04BlackSilverado
I do not undersatand how someone can buy a "used" product and hold it to "new" standards....
So what are you building, or are you trying to sell them?
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well when the seller assures the buyer that the item is good and guarantees them by saying this:
"I am in no way trying to hide anything from you, I am just selling a good set of pistons and rods.
If you feel that this is not a good deal then I will refund your $$."
And then my machinist says that he would not recommend running them. I now feel like it was not a good deal, then the seller needs to keep his word and refund my "$$"
Just like you stated you are NOT a machinist, so who are you to say they are good to run, and that they are being held at TOO high of a standard.
So what am i supposed to do now?
7 new pistons @ $56 ea. =$392
7 sets of rings @ $23 ea= $161
8 rods and 1 good piston=$200
So you expect me to pay over $760, to have a decent set of STOCK rods and pistons???
"I am in no way trying to hide anything from you, I am just selling a good set of pistons and rods.
If you feel that this is not a good deal then I will refund your $$."
And then my machinist says that he would not recommend running them. I now feel like it was not a good deal, then the seller needs to keep his word and refund my "$$"
Just like you stated you are NOT a machinist, so who are you to say they are good to run, and that they are being held at TOO high of a standard.
So what am i supposed to do now?
7 new pistons @ $56 ea. =$392
7 sets of rings @ $23 ea= $161
8 rods and 1 good piston=$200
So you expect me to pay over $760, to have a decent set of STOCK rods and pistons???
#17
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tootall
that depends on what they're going in, and what you're expecting out of them.
So what are you building, or are you trying to sell them?
So what are you building, or are you trying to sell them?
Originally Posted by 2002C5COUPE
Well when the seller assures the buyer that the item is good and guarantees them by saying this:
"I am in no way trying to hide anything from you, I am just selling a good set of pistons and rods.
If you feel that this is not a good deal then I will refund your $$."
"I am in no way trying to hide anything from you, I am just selling a good set of pistons and rods.
If you feel that this is not a good deal then I will refund your $$."
I replaced the one cracked piston and had the others looked at and was told that they are all set.
Originally Posted by 2002C5COUPE
And then my machinist says that he would not recommend running them. I now feel like it was not a good deal, then the seller needs to keep his word and refund my "$$"
Just like you stated you are NOT a machinist, so who are you to say they are good to run, and that they are being held at TOO high of a standard.
So what am i supposed to do now?
7 new pistons @ $56 ea. =$392
7 sets of rings @ $23 ea= $161
8 rods and 1 good piston=$200
So you expect me to pay over $760, to have a decent set of STOCK rods and pistons???
Just like you stated you are NOT a machinist, so who are you to say they are good to run, and that they are being held at TOO high of a standard.
So what am i supposed to do now?
7 new pistons @ $56 ea. =$392
7 sets of rings @ $23 ea= $161
8 rods and 1 good piston=$200
So you expect me to pay over $760, to have a decent set of STOCK rods and pistons???
Did your builder just say he would "not recommend" to use them, or that you CAN'T use them???
If you want NEW pistons then you"ll have to spend $700+ dollars
But you bought USED pistons and you get what you pay for.
Last edited by 04BlackSilverado; 04-04-2007 at 04:01 PM.
#18
2002C5COUPE,
I think your machinist is an idiot, if he indeed rejected these pistons based on the skirt measurement variance of .007". I am a Mechanical Designer and deal with CNC machinist and fabrication day in and day out, for the past 10 years. The measurement of .007" variance of the piston skirt is within tolerance specs for OE stock replacement piston, even high performance pistons. All the skirt does is hold the piston from rocking in the bore, one being .007" off from the next will not be noticeable in a build. My impression of this thread is that you no longer want these pistons due to some other reason you wish not to disclose. That is fine, but to say that those minute variances are cause for the pistons to be un-useable is ignorant, no reputable machine shop will ever reject pistons for that reason. That .007" would equate to .003" to undersize or .004" oversize. There is nothing wrong with that measurement. Now if it was to the crown, it could be argued if you were blueprinting an engine with these pistons. But if I were doing that, I would not use used pistons.
I think your machinist is an idiot, if he indeed rejected these pistons based on the skirt measurement variance of .007". I am a Mechanical Designer and deal with CNC machinist and fabrication day in and day out, for the past 10 years. The measurement of .007" variance of the piston skirt is within tolerance specs for OE stock replacement piston, even high performance pistons. All the skirt does is hold the piston from rocking in the bore, one being .007" off from the next will not be noticeable in a build. My impression of this thread is that you no longer want these pistons due to some other reason you wish not to disclose. That is fine, but to say that those minute variances are cause for the pistons to be un-useable is ignorant, no reputable machine shop will ever reject pistons for that reason. That .007" would equate to .003" to undersize or .004" oversize. There is nothing wrong with that measurement. Now if it was to the crown, it could be argued if you were blueprinting an engine with these pistons. But if I were doing that, I would not use used pistons.
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 12secSS
2002C5COUPE,
I think your machinist is an idiot, if he indeed rejected these pistons based on the skirt measurement variance of .007". I am a Mechanical Designer and deal with CNC machinist and fabrication day in and day out, for the past 10 years. The measurement of .007" variance of the piston skirt is within tolerance specs for OE stock replacement piston, even high performance pistons. All the skirt does is hold the piston from rocking in the bore, one being .007" off from the next will not be noticeable in a build. My impression of this thread is that you no longer want these pistons due to some other reason you wish not to disclose. That is fine, but to say that those minute variances are cause for the pistons to be un-useable is ignorant, no reputable machine shop will ever reject pistons for that reason. That .007" would equate to .003" to undersize or .004" oversize. There is nothing wrong with that measurement. Now if it was to the crown, it could be argued if you were blueprinting an engine with these pistons. But if I were doing that, I would not use used pistons.
I think your machinist is an idiot, if he indeed rejected these pistons based on the skirt measurement variance of .007". I am a Mechanical Designer and deal with CNC machinist and fabrication day in and day out, for the past 10 years. The measurement of .007" variance of the piston skirt is within tolerance specs for OE stock replacement piston, even high performance pistons. All the skirt does is hold the piston from rocking in the bore, one being .007" off from the next will not be noticeable in a build. My impression of this thread is that you no longer want these pistons due to some other reason you wish not to disclose. That is fine, but to say that those minute variances are cause for the pistons to be un-useable is ignorant, no reputable machine shop will ever reject pistons for that reason. That .007" would equate to .003" to undersize or .004" oversize. There is nothing wrong with that measurement. Now if it was to the crown, it could be argued if you were blueprinting an engine with these pistons. But if I were doing that, I would not use used pistons.
BTW the variances were between .003-.009". He didn't want to use them because he said there was a good chance of them rocking in the bores, causing piston noise (i can't remember exactly the way he put it). That's within OE specs?? Then why did the new one not have these variances??
Why would i no longer want these pistons? I'll be going back with stock pistons, so what difference would it make?? I would love for this to not have happened, and for them to be good, and not be f'd over by a board member. I bought them with the seller's word that they were good and that if i was not happy that i would get a refund. Well, you see how much someone's word is worth now i guess.......