INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Stroker suitable for Radix 112?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008, 09:44 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tamatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stroker suitable for Radix 112?

I have already bought a Radix (112 I believe) and an LQ4. I was lied to and was told it was an '02, but it turns out it is an '99-'00 iron header! Since the crank is longer I can't bolt up my T56. I'm having a hard time selling this motor, so I'm forced to make this one work.
What's the best budget stroker combo that will support a Radix 112? I don't want the 112 to be a restriction, though, so nothing too outrageous. Since I'll have to change heads too, is there a combo that works best with the Radix and strokers?
Old 03-24-2008, 09:49 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The MP112 won't support anything well larger than a 6.0. I'd suggest swaping out the crank for a 01+ 6.0 crank or a 5.7/5.3 (same stroke). Those iron heads flow well and are the same port config as the alum 317's from what I remember....just iron.
Old 03-25-2008, 08:04 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tamatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What cranks will fit without modifications? I know the Gen3 cranks will fit, but which is ideal? Are LS1 cranks the same stroke? Wouldn't the rods/pistons need to be balanced with a different crank? I thought these motors were internally balanced...
Old 03-25-2008, 10:01 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3,5.7,6.0 cranks are all interchangable. Same stroke, same rods. Theoretically a 5.3/5.7 crank in a 6.0 would need a re-balance due to the different weight pistons but truthfully the factory balances are not very accurate compared to your local speed shop.
Old 03-26-2008, 08:22 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tamatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would a 5.3 rotating assembly be interchangeable? If I got a 5.3 crank, I'd need to get it balanced with the 6.0 rods/pistons. What if I were to get a 5.3 rotating assembly and use that instead of the 6.0 internals? Or would the 5.3 rotating assembly be weaker than the 6.0?
Old 03-26-2008, 10:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tamatt27
Would a 5.3 rotating assembly be interchangeable? If I got a 5.3 crank, I'd need to get it balanced with the 6.0 rods/pistons. What if I were to get a 5.3 rotating assembly and use that instead of the 6.0 internals? Or would the 5.3 rotating assembly be weaker than the 6.0?
5.3,5.7,6.0 rods, and crank are all the same strength.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BROKE-aSS-BLAZER
GM Parts Classifieds
7
10-13-2017 03:50 PM
Jake75
GM Parts Classifieds
5
10-02-2015 02:28 PM
sTNT971
FORCED INDUCTION
6
09-26-2015 04:22 PM
bagged7104SS
GM Parts Classifieds
23
09-24-2015 08:42 PM



Quick Reply: Stroker suitable for Radix 112?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.