INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

new stuff from Comp Cams for '08

Old Nov 30, 2007 | 06:29 AM
  #11  
ZR1 DREAMING's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,277
Likes: 1
From: Ham Lake, MN
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
I am not sure I see much point in them making a 92mm when it was already a 90mm. Should jump it up to 100mm or so...
I have a feeling it's more than just a 2mm larger opening... I'm sure the runners and plenum are tweeked as well.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #12  
dkota1968's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Default

I was just saying i think its probably better, being that its from Wilson, they are a pretty respected company. probably wouldnt be worth it to people to trade in their Fast 90 unless they are pushing a ton of power, but if someone is looking for their first aftermarket manifold its bigger than all the rest.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #13  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

I hear ya, I guess my point was that I felt they would make it more marketable by providing additional info as to why the new one would justify the coin for those whom already had 90's. I mean if I had a 90mm and the only difference between mine and the 92mm was 2mm I dont think I would waste my time, however if the intake was ported different allowing better/greater airflow caracteristics then that would be a different story.. Know what i mean?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #14  
ZR1 DREAMING's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,277
Likes: 1
From: Ham Lake, MN
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
I hear ya, I guess my point was that I felt they would make it more marketable by providing additional info as to why the new one would justify the coin for those whom already had 90's. I mean if I had a 90mm and the only difference between mine and the 92mm was 2mm I dont think I would waste my time, however if the intake was ported different allowing better/greater airflow caracteristics then that would be a different story.. Know what i mean?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 11:48 PM
  #15  
dkota1968's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Default

i hear ya .
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
03chevy5.3rcsb's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield
Default

Originally Posted by Superado
per the link...a 5% better airflow
AND...
it's made from a more expensive material...YAY!
more expensive than the already extremely expensive composite? waht's the new material, platinum?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluchevypick
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
4
Aug 18, 2015 09:11 AM
low2001gmc
GM Parts Classifieds
0
Jul 23, 2015 05:10 PM
Ammadien
New Members
1
Jul 22, 2015 08:50 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM
4B11T
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
Jul 13, 2015 03:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.