INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

cam recomendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #1  
flossinon_24s's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: springfield tennessee
Default cam recomendation

Im looking at the comp 222/224 on a 112 lsa for my 99 sierra. It has a 5.3 for now, but will be a 6.0 soon. I will run long tubes and a yank 2600 or 3000. Does the cam I picked out sound good, or should I go a different route? Also, Im currently running a 3.42:1 gear
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #2  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

228R in the 6.0 and run it, why cam the 5.3 if your droppin a 6.0 in soon?
get a set of gears as well, 4.10's should do ya some good
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #3  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

3.42s with those 24"s? hahaha....you've got bigger issues than what cam to choose..
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
flossinon_24s's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: springfield tennessee
Default

different truck, my 99 is a rcsb, my black truck is blown and cammed 6.0 and has 3.73s. I say my rcsb will have a 6.0 soon, but I get lazy spurts, so it could be 6 months before I get a chance to get it in.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
flossinon_24s's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: springfield tennessee
Default

and the 24s are long gone, just havent taken new pics yet, truck looks totaly different now
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #6  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

maybe the popular TR220/112 would be a good choice for your '99 then produces good power and great driveability!
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
flossinon_24s's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: springfield tennessee
Default

which stall would be better with the tr220. I dont daily drive either truck, but would like to be able to drive them and get decent milage. Also, Ill probably be ordering 2 cams, I need a cam for my LS1 swapped 2dr 2wd tahoe.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #8  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

I think a 3600 would make it really scream while still retaining good street manners, with good mileage. If it was more of a DD then maybe a 3000-3200
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:08 PM
  #9  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

im running the TR220/112 and you can really feel it kick in right around 3000 rpm and it pulls hard until 6500 or so
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lawhitediamante
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
Aug 12, 2015 12:14 PM
vmaxpro
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
2
Aug 8, 2015 10:49 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.