Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

VVT 5.3 Cam swap review, Comp 401, idle clip inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2015, 03:06 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
gravedigger472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default VVT 5.3 Cam swap review, Comp 401, idle clip inside

Cam Specs: 214° int 228° exh@0.050” lift is 0.559” intake 0.571” exhaust 114° LSA

Just last week I installed a comp 189-401-13 VVT cam into my 2010 Silverado LMG 5.3. The truck has an Airaid MIT and a dumped muffler. Along the way I installed a VVT phaser limiter, DOD delete (LS7 lifters) COMP 918 beehive springs, and COMP rocker trunnion upgrade. COMP advertise no loss of low end torque, and I can vouch for this 100%. (Based on the SOTP) the truck pulls just as hard as before on the bottom end, stronger mid range, and up top it pulls way harder.

Using HPTuners I set the the shift points to about 6,200rpm on the 6l80. It hasnt been on a dyno yet, but I would guess about 40-50whp gain up top based on experience. Also I haven't messed with the VVT tables yet. It set at about 7 degrees of cam retard by 6,000 RPM.

I can't stress enough about checking the part number on your cam phaser. I have seen many people online swap VVT cams and complain about a loss in torque, having not checked what cam core to use. If you use the wrong cam core you will loose low end torque. (see the sticky at the top of this section for more info) My 2010 used a 189 cam core.

It has a decent sounding idle, great daily driver truck cam. Check out the idle clip...


Last edited by gravedigger472; 12-07-2015 at 09:13 AM.
The following users liked this post:
randybill (01-23-2020)
Old 12-07-2015, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
Idryfly5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Red Bud, Illinois
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sounds good! i've been debating one of the comp vvt cams in my 6.2, just haven't pulled the trigger.
Old 12-07-2015, 03:19 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

How much advance do you have in the cam in the lower RPM range?
Old 12-07-2015, 07:09 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
gravedigger472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
How much advance do you have in the cam in the lower RPM range?
The tables control retard only, all the advance is ground into the cam. The cam stays fixed (max advance) from zero to 4,000. Starting at 4,000rpm it retards the cam 1 degree and by 6,000 rpm it's 6 degrees or so. These are the stock settings I haven't messed with yet. A few people I have talked with said leave it, some said make it retard less. Once I get in on a dyno I will play with it and see what is what.
Old 12-07-2015, 07:19 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
gravedigger472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Idryfly5
sounds good! i've been debating one of the comp vvt cams in my 6.2, just haven't pulled the trigger.
Thanks! I would say do it without any hesitation. I'm going turbo soon, otherwise I would have done more, but I am sure headers cam, and other supporting mods would wake a 6.2 up even more.
Old 12-07-2015, 07:25 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Thats all it does stock? Doesnt seem right. Why would you need a 20* phaser limiter limiter if you only retard it 6*? Or do you mean 6* total retard after phasing out all the advance ground into the cam? Do you know how much advance is ground into that cam?
Old 12-07-2015, 07:39 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
gravedigger472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Two reasons, from my understanding for needing the phase limiter. First under light load low RPM cruise condition the stock tune commands retard in the 25 to 30 degree range for a natural EGR effect, emissions, and for mileage. I disabled this out in my tune. Secondly I read somewhere that if the engine changes speed too quickly the cam could retard even further than is commanded causint PTV contact. ( I think the stock phaser has up to 58 degrees depending on the year). Unlikely that it would happen, but I guess COMP decided rather safe than sorry.

As far as actual retard under load/wot, yes it only retards about 6-7 degrees total. The cam card lists the specs given at a 107 degree intak centerline but I do not know if correlates to the intake centerline with the cam in park/max advance.

Last edited by gravedigger472; 12-08-2015 at 11:01 AM.
Old 12-07-2015, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
gravedigger472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quoted from a HP Tuners forum...
"For the 6.0 liter (LY6, L76) and the 6.2 liter (L92) engine, the Park position for the CMP actuator and camshaft is 8.5 degrees before top dead center (BTDC) or 17 crankshaft degrees BTDC. The engine control module (ECM) can only command the CMP actuator to retard the valve timing from the Park position or advance the valve timing back to the Park position. The total range of valve timing authority is 31 degrees camshaft rotation, or 62 degrees of crankshaft rotation. The control range is from the Park position of 8.5 degrees camshaft or 17 degrees crankshaft BTDC, to 22.5 degrees camshaft or 45 degrees crankshaft after top dead center (ATDC)." --according to ALL DATA's description."


Edit:

Attached a pic of my actual cam retard tables.

Name:  stock%20cam%20retard_zpsgfkzkaef.jpg
Views: 3350
Size:  255.0 KB

Last edited by gravedigger472; 12-08-2015 at 10:21 AM.
Old 01-31-2016, 01:57 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Sunsetorangehd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the vvt only for better mileage.
Old 01-31-2016, 10:14 PM
  #10  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: columbia,mo
Posts: 37
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the same cam in a 2010 ly6 motor with stock exhaust and little head work and 4 speed and made 345hp and 378tq at the wheels.

Last edited by 2000 bigred; 02-01-2016 at 04:30 PM.


Quick Reply: VVT 5.3 Cam swap review, Comp 401, idle clip inside



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.