Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

6.2 exhaust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2010, 08:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WVman
I'm asking here, but from my experience a smaller pipe will give you more low end and take some from the top if it's too small. A bigger pipe will lose a little on the low end but gain on top. It happened when I added a 3" catback to my 91 Chevy with a TB and 350. It lost all kinds of low end with the 3" on it. Thanks for the help guys!
I put a Borla single cat-back on my 01 Tahoe 5.3 and I definitely lost a tad off the bottom but it more than made up for it in mid and high rpms.

I like that HP/Exhaust info. Shows why they went bigger on the 6.2. I really like the sound of my stock. A bit louder would be nice but for stock it impressed me. Especially right at cold startup in the morning. Sounds real throaty
Old 05-11-2010, 09:17 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
WVman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bish
I put a Borla single cat-back on my 01 Tahoe 5.3 and I definitely lost a tad off the bottom but it more than made up for it in mid and high rpms.

I like that HP/Exhaust info. Shows why they went bigger on the 6.2. I really like the sound of my stock. A bit louder would be nice but for stock it impressed me. Especially right at cold startup in the morning. Sounds real throaty
Your right, the stock exhaust does sound good. I just want a little more from it. I kind of wonder how the stock exhaust would sound with headers and no cats.
Old 05-11-2010, 09:40 PM
  #13  
Formerly darynC-10/23/10
iTrader: (19)
 
Daryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gonzales louisiana
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

like a stock exhuast.
Old 05-11-2010, 09:52 PM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
WVman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryn c
like a stock exhuast.
Funny guy! I guess I had that coming..
Old 05-11-2010, 09:56 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I think you'll like the stock exhaust once your cammed with headers and no cats. It definitely doesn't sound stock, at least on my setup. You can tell it's cammed, and it has some tone around town, but once you hop on the highway it's dead stock silent. Pretty nice.
Old 05-11-2010, 10:02 PM
  #16  
Formerly darynC-10/23/10
iTrader: (19)
 
Daryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gonzales louisiana
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to answer yer qwestion.. here... this is my old 5.3 cam header magnaflow cats. closed cutout, stock exh

http://www.youtube.com/user/cawlmedr.../5/UBCcfbvfSPs
Old 05-11-2010, 10:30 PM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
WVman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I think you'll like the stock exhaust once your cammed with headers and no cats. It definitely doesn't sound stock, at least on my setup. You can tell it's cammed, and it has some tone around town, but once you hop on the highway it's dead stock silent. Pretty nice.
That sounds like what I'm looking for. What headers and cam are you running if you don't mind? I can get OBX 6.2 headers and Y for 525 shipped.
Old 05-11-2010, 10:35 PM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
WVman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryn c
to answer yer qwestion.. here... this is my old 5.3 cam header magnaflow cats. closed cutout, stock exh

http://www.youtube.com/user/cawlmedr.../5/UBCcfbvfSPs
The 5.3 exhaust isn't the same as the 6.2 is it? I thought the the 6.2l was the only ones with the 3.5" exhaust?
Old 05-11-2010, 11:22 PM
  #19  
Formerly darynC-10/23/10
iTrader: (19)
 
Daryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gonzales louisiana
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3........ 6.2......... my exhaust it the same...pacesetter headers, 3" y pipe
Old 05-15-2010, 01:47 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Allgonoshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what you do depends on your objective.
better sound--- take the resonator out of the tail pipe
ultimate performance-----3.5 inch and big tube headers
reasonable cost----- taken out resonator
good sound and performance improvement-----3" cat back, maybe headers

keep in mind, Headers make a huge difference in the sound volume of a catback.

My goal is performance without too much noise.

I have done mine in 5 stages. [ I own a shop so have the luxury of trying stuff]

1. I did arh 1 7/8 headers and their catted y pipe in the proper size tubing to fit the big oe exhaust flange and 3.5 inch tubing, at the same time
I removed the resonator from the tail pipe. This set up worked well and sounded better than stock, but had a thinny sound like a flowmaster
that I didn't care for. Baffles in oe muffler were rattling.
2. I put a 3.5 inch straight thru Magnaflow in place of the stock muffler. part #14909, sounded really good but way to loud for me.
3. added a 3.5 inch magnaflow resonator, part # 14919 in front of the 3.5 inch magnaflow muffler. this was still too loud.
4. took off all the magnaflow stuff and oe stuff behind the front flange and installed new dynomax stainless 3" catback with straight thru muffler.
sounded good but still too loud.
5. added a 3" magnaflow straight thru resonator in front of the dynomax muffler, perfection


I know sound is a personal deal and some guys would do headers, no cats and 3.5" cat back and think it sounds great.

I can definitely say that the 3 inch stuff gave me back some low rpm power that I lost with the big headers and 3.5 inch stuff.

Last edited by Allgonoshow; 05-15-2010 at 02:16 PM.


Quick Reply: 6.2 exhaust?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.