GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

realistically 408 NA numbers ( anyone have any?)

Old May 4, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #21  
Flaco's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Across the neighbors
Default

done pretty quite of bit of 402-416's and all being withing 500-550 on motor....all these with mild nitrous cams... back in the 414 in my truck was running a 12.5 to 1 and made 600+ but was peaking at 7800 also..

500+ is very easy acheivable, 600 plus is gets a bit more expensive in valvetrain parts being the most important ...the topend part...ie. heads,cam,etc...but 12 to 1 u can still run pump gas though....

but what do i know, i only run 13's...

good luck skeet
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #22  
fossil's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Ms
Default

450rwhp/440rwtq with 232/238 .600/.600 lift 113 lsa. CR a very low 10.8
Best 1/4 mile pass Oct 09 11.78 and I have leaned her out a bit this year and have been running some 7.40's at local 1/8 strip(at memphis this would be some high 7.30's in 1/8). Memphis closed so no 1/4 mile passes so far this year.
shift @ 7,000 rpms.

Goodluck Skeet
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 01:55 AM
  #23  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Unless you spin it I don't think you'll reach your goal of 600 N/A. I would suggest upping the compression into the 13's and running race gas since it's gonna see very limited use.
Subscribing for the build!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #24  
skeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

gonna be close guys, i have a good feeling something great is gonna come out of this setup

time will tell !!


yeah i know its a year old, and i still never gotten any realistic numbers, i been doing more research and came up with a 560 rwhp setup!! but IIRC i seen a 570 somewhere!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 10:48 PM
  #25  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I guess ill throw in my 2 cents...

my 11:1 408 with stock 317 heads and tvs1900 at 7.5lbs put down about 600, granted this was on a more expensive drivetrain, so I would guess 650ish in something like you would be running.

basically same engine with 9.5 compression NA was around 400 just going by feel

If you plan on spinning it 7k+ have you thought about solid rollers?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 12:52 AM
  #26  
2004SSS's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: southern california
Default

600 rwhp will be tough man , i see 550 for sure . your trans absorbs more power than the t56 guys .

ive seen a few 418's make just over 700 @ the crank built by a friend.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 09:07 AM
  #27  
skeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
I guess ill throw in my 2 cents...

my 11:1 408 with stock 317 heads and tvs1900 at 7.5lbs put down about 600, granted this was on a more expensive drivetrain, so I would guess 650ish in something like you would be running.

basically same engine with 9.5 compression NA was around 400 just going by feel

If you plan on spinning it 7k+ have you thought about solid rollers?

yeah i thought about a solid roller, and damn near changed my mind in doing so, wouldnt take much if i decide to go solid roller, change of lifters and cam will get it done.

Originally Posted by 2004SSS
600 rwhp will be tough man , i see 550 for sure . your trans absorbs more power than the t56 guys .

ive seen a few 418's make just over 700 @ the crank built by a friend.
i hear ya, it'll be really tough, i doubt im there but it feels close, maybe 570 i had to pull the 4" intake tube cause it was a huge restriction, it made a 8-10 kpa difference , all i need is the trans to hold up lol which im prepared to go th400 when necassary. anyway time will tell, we'll see what she does on the track this evening ( tonight) im probably expecting to much from this setup but it feels like its definitely there..
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #28  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

Looking forward to it David. Gonna be an interesting night getting her to hook up again
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #29  
ramairroughneck's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Atoka,OK
Default

Originally Posted by skeet
wouldnt take much if i decide to go solid roller, change of lifters and cam will get it done.
Keep in mind you'll need modified spring pockets, which may not be possible on the l92s, higher lift springs, adjustable rockers, maybe a double roller chain and larger pushrods depending on what you have now. The Lsx intake is going to be a restriction in the area that a solid roller would really shine, so add a single plane or sheetmetal intake in their as well. It wont be cheap but it will definately be an awesome setup. You might also check out some of the E85 setups on the corvette forum. Those guys are putting down some amazing numbers with hydraulic cams, plastic intakes, and high compression. E85 would require major attension to the fuel system though. 600 na is going to be expensive anyway you go. Good luck. Sounds like you got a nice list of parts already. I am looking forward to seeing where this goes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nabozny21
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Oct 17, 2015 07:47 PM
KleanKustoms
FORCED INDUCTION
1
Sep 30, 2015 05:07 PM
Slammed silverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Sep 28, 2015 06:14 PM
sTNT971
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Sep 26, 2015 04:22 PM
11MPG
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
3
Sep 10, 2015 08:34 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.