Is PARISH dethroned????
Jun 6, 2005 | 11:17 PM
#32
Originally Posted by j4nash
also thing guy told me that when he first put his 408 in his tranny was slipping. and that was before he put it to 15psi or 20 psi of boost and put the 50 shot or 100 shot
Jun 6, 2005 | 11:17 PM
#33
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Well, I won't call BS on anyone but, there are alot of questions I'd like to see answered before I just accept it.
BTW, goshawk23 - you have a PM about that other thread.
BTW, goshawk23 - you have a PM about that other thread.
Jun 6, 2005 | 11:24 PM
#35
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Originally Posted by parish8
hmm, sweet times. kinda makes me wonder what i am doing wrong since i am running more boost, more nitrous and less weight.
i better get busy.
i better get busy.
Jun 6, 2005 | 11:38 PM
#36
11 Second Truck Club
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: scottsboro, al
At this point I still believe him and if it is true I have alot of work to do.
Jun 6, 2005 | 11:59 PM
#37
12 Second Truck Club
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
OK. He says he's running a 3.26" pulley on a p1sc to make 15 psi on a 408. I run a 3.4" pulley on a p1sc, and make 12 psi on my STOCK CAMMED 5.3 with NO belt slip.
For reference, on my 5.3---4.0"=9psi, 3.6=11psi, 3.4=12psi, so .2 inch is worth about 1 psi on a 5.3.
Also, 3.26 sounds like a BS size to me. I've always seen sizes in .1 inch increments. 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 etc.
For reference, on my 5.3---4.0"=9psi, 3.6=11psi, 3.4=12psi, so .2 inch is worth about 1 psi on a 5.3.
Also, 3.26 sounds like a BS size to me. I've always seen sizes in .1 inch increments. 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 etc.
Jun 7, 2005 | 12:30 AM
#38
Originally Posted by GirlsDoItRight
ya.. its bs. Did you see the post about how he was wondering about that dude with the IP thing in his sig. Dude seems like a dumbass... Jim just summed it up when he figured out the hp numbers compared to the set up and weight differences, its not possible. Unless there was a strong head wind ... like a 90mph head wind 
Jun 7, 2005 | 12:57 AM
#39
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Just got back from getting my truck tuned....
It ran a 10.45@142mph, spinning all 4 wheels till 80 mph on a 2.4 60 ft. I figure that leaves me some room for improvement, maybe even single digits. I should have the video up soon, everybody please be patient...................
It ran a 10.45@142mph, spinning all 4 wheels till 80 mph on a 2.4 60 ft. I figure that leaves me some room for improvement, maybe even single digits. I should have the video up soon, everybody please be patient...................
Jun 7, 2005 | 01:03 AM
#40
with no disrespect to the SSS community and with respect to the ls1truck community, let me be the first on both forums to throw the 
ill tell u this if i were the guy who ran the new fastest time in a ls1truck,.... i'd ******* go to the local kinkos to scan my timeslip. this guy is all talk and frankly i think its kind of disrespect to the guys like turboberserker, parish, 2toneblown, gmcski who pour their heart money and soul into these trucks......i have a rep on here for stating my belifs and my fellow ls1truckers i believe this guy is full of ****.
ill tell u this if i were the guy who ran the new fastest time in a ls1truck,.... i'd ******* go to the local kinkos to scan my timeslip. this guy is all talk and frankly i think its kind of disrespect to the guys like turboberserker, parish, 2toneblown, gmcski who pour their heart money and soul into these trucks......i have a rep on here for stating my belifs and my fellow ls1truckers i believe this guy is full of ****.